We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and NetSuite ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Activity Based Costing Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"It is highly configurable. You have a choice in terms of how you want to run it. You can run it in your own data center, in a private cloud, or in a public cloud. The choice is really up to the customer."
"The product can scale."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"I think it is strong in sales, inventory, and pricing."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"The product has been stable so far."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."
"NetSuite ERP has dramatically improved our organization. We went from QuickBooks to NetSuite. You can compare this transition to changing from tennis shoes to a flying car."
"I would say that the solution is highly configurable."
"NetSuite is significantly more affordable than Oracle EBS and offers a wider range of features than other OEMs."
"The initial setup is easy."
"I am impressed with the product's ease of use. It also helps us reduce the techstack."
"The inventory feature in NetSuite ERP is very valuable to me because it provides clear estimates about the depreciation of details and includes useful mobile modules."
"NetSuite ERP is good for a trading company that involves buying and selling."
"It is a very solid product for finance and procure-to-pay processes."
"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."
"The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"The product’s pricing should be improved."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"Forms customization should be easier. Currently, it has to go through the development life cycle."
"Needs better integration with IoT solutions."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"If they could provide more integration options to connect with different products, that would be ideal."
"NetSuite ERP's UI could be improved. There are some features that are very complex that do not have to be. There are some aspects of the solution that could be simplified and this can include the documentation. Since it's a very complex tool, you expect to have great detailed documentation to help you implement it."
"The communication has been peculiar, and the overall commercial process has been less than satisfactory."
"The areas that this product needs to improve on is the implementation and inventory processes."
"As with any system offering large volumes of data, there are limitations on processing large volumes of data in custom ways."
"The solution is not user-friendly and it is complex to use."
"In NetSuite ERP, they should focus on offering better customization options."
"There is a lot of room for improvement. Multiple manufacturing features need to be updated on NetSuite. More functionalities need to be added. I think there are a lot of functionalities coming out for warehouse management systems and manufacturing automation via advanced manufacturing functionalities. I think they need to improve a little more on those aspects and make it easier on the scheduling aspect."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 3rd in Activity Based Costing Software with 55 reviews while NetSuite ERP is ranked 4th in Activity Based Costing Software with 33 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while NetSuite ERP is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetSuite ERP writes "Carries a broad range of applications, specifically in the field services area". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, PeopleSoft and Microsoft Dynamics AX, whereas NetSuite ERP is most compared with Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, NetSuite OneWorld, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and Epicor ERP. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. NetSuite ERP report.
See our list of best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.
We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.