We performed a comparison between Jira and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Jira has a good reporting system. It also has an API, so we can do all sorts of reporting."
"Jira is flexible and accessible for the end-user. It lets users track their requests. The look and feel are good for our purposes."
"It's a very complete product overall."
"The integration of other open source tools with Jira is very useful. It allows us to create documents and transcriptions, making it versatile beyond software development."
"We love the bulk edit feature. Jira also integrates well with Bitbucket."
"The initial setup isn't too complicated."
"We have found the structure, functionality, and how Jira handles the tickets most valuable."
"We can cope with processes easily without adapting the tool, but adapting the tool to processes."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"In JIRA, it's a bit complex in terms of what advanced search queries we use. Sharing them is also a problem. Because TFS is on the cloud, we can easily save that query and share it with our team members."
"There's a really steep learning curve for configuration."
"The solution could improve by having its own tool for quality lifecycle management."
"The Jira dashboards could be more useful. The dashboards have good widgets but the comparison of data over time or extraction of trends from the data is not easy."
"Improvements in Jira for the next release could include adding AI tools for dashboarding, making it easier to report insights, and enhancing business intelligence capabilities. It should also improve on-prem support. As far as I know, Jira's on-premise support is being discontinued. From last year onward, they stopped providing on-premise licenses and now only offer cloud support. This shift happened gradually, and I believe they now only offer cloud licenses."
"The filtration could be better."
"There are a limited number of gadgets accessible in Jira; thus, additional ones should be supported."
"Ease of administration and customization. It is really clunky in this area."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
Earn 20 points
Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 266 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Jira is rated 8.2, while PractiTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise and Microsoft Azure DevOps. See our Jira vs. PractiTest report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.