We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure DevOps and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Azure is an advantage when working with other Microsoft solutions."
"Most of the features are very valuable for us, especially the source code control and task management."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it saves time."
"Before using this solution, we had to deploy our applications, from pre-production to production, manually."
"Valuable features for project management and tracking in Azure DevOps include a portal displaying test results, check-in/check-out activity, and developer/tester productivity."
"Some of the most valuable features are the ease of use and the ability to monitor a lot of things. It has a lot of applications and facilities that meet all the developers' requirements. For example, we can use application insights to get an idea of our application's performance. Since it's cloud-based, it's really good for collaboration and working as a team."
"The build and release management features are valuable."
"The product is easy to use and very stable."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"Some of the queries, the way they're built, need to be looked at. We need better query tools."
"There is room for improvement on the UI side, especially with merge requests. If we compare Azure DevOps to GitLab when it comes to branches and PRs (pull requests), GitLab has a better interface."
"I would like to see more customization available to the administrator."
"The tool has a logical link between epic feature, user story, and task, but when you try to generate a report to show the delivery progress against a feature, it is not easy. To see the percentage completion for a feature or progress of any delivery, it is not easy to draw a report."
"Azure has not yet advanced to the performance level of the other major competitors and is missing integration with important technologies."
"Microsoft Azure DevOps could improve by having better integration with other email servers."
"The price could be lowered. It would be nice if it was cheaper."
"The testing environment and different pipelining concepts can be improved."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Azure DevOps is ranked 2nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 127 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Microsoft Azure DevOps is rated 8.2, while PractiTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure DevOps writes "Allows us to deploy code to production without releasing certain features immediately and agile project management capabilities offer resource-leveling". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". Microsoft Azure DevOps is most compared with GitLab, Jira, TFS, Rally Software and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Jira and Zephyr Enterprise. See our Microsoft Azure DevOps vs. PractiTest report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.