We performed a comparison between ManageEngine OpManager and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"I like being able to push configurations to multiple devices. If you have the same configurations for all the branches, it's easier to use ManageEngine OpManager and push configurations at once rather than individually pushing them to each device."
"The setup was easy."
"The application monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The dashboard, versatility and larger horizon are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."
"The detections are fine when they work."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to reach most of our network devices and get the most from them."
"The integration with the firewall monitoring, the security monitoring, is great."
"The most valuable features for us are the monitoring, the health explorer, and the console."
"The product has helped our organization with in-depth monitoring."
"The most valuable features in SCOM are Azure monitoring and integration with Azure Monitor for monitoring Azure-hosted servers from SCOM on-premises."
"The stability has been great."
"They have great integration with the active directory."
"This solution helps our application teams by allowing them to drill further into issues and perform a root cause analysis."
"Availability monitoring is the feature I have found most valuable, as well as the capacity and ability to send notifications."
"The tool helps to monitor Windows servers. It offers alerts from a central location."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"ManageEngine OpManager could improve the default dashboards that are available. We are not able to customize them easily and they do not give us the information we need unless we customize them. You need to have the technical knowledge to be able to do it, the customization should be easier."
"The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now."
"The integration with various OEM products could be simplified."
"The initial setup is a bit complicated. It needs a technician who is very aware of the flow and how to officially set up the flow chart, etc."
"We have been facing an issue since last year when a lot of our users started to work from home through their mobiles or computers. We are having trouble reaching these devices. We are now planning to publish our instance to the cloud so that we can reach these devices. Its performance should be improved in terms of the discovery of the devices. I would like to feel confident with the discovery that this solution does. For example, on my dashboard, I would like to be able to view a list of all devices seen on a specific server. At present, it is difficult to find such information. This would be an excellent feature to have."
"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."
"They should add more features to URL monitoring."
"The dashboard could include more features."
"The price could be improved."
"The management of the servers could be better."
"Regarding certain issues in the solution, it can be difficult to generate reports if we have a program that is not user-friendly for reporting. While this is not necessarily negative, we may need to use another solution."
"All of the areas of reporting are very bad and need to be improved."
"I would like to see more standard libraries for the market solutions, out of the box, that you don't need to do a lot of work on."
"The solution’s initial setup is difficult."
"It could use some system enhancements, such as better dashboards."
"The interface is a little bit cumbersome and certain actions could be simplified."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 15th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews while SCOM is ranked 10th in Network Monitoring Software with 78 reviews. ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, Nagios XI and WhatsUp Gold, whereas SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and AppDynamics. See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. SCOM report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.