We performed a comparison between ManageEngine OpManager and Wireshark based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"I like being able to push configurations to multiple devices. If you have the same configurations for all the branches, it's easier to use ManageEngine OpManager and push configurations at once rather than individually pushing them to each device."
"It is easy to use and deploy."
"Defining thresholds and other alerting criteria is fairly simple and would not require a lot of training. This is very useful if you are managing a large environment."
"Some of the useful features are NetFlow and analytics."
"We don't have to keep an eye on it; it has a good automation option, which keeps us informed. It gives very less false positives. Overall, a really great product."
"The features we found most valuable in ManageEngine OpManager are the probe server and reporting because they're pretty good features."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to reach most of our network devices and get the most from them."
"The solution is easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage and monitor the environment. Instead of being reactive, it's proactive."
"The options that are required to get the details for the packet drops are good."
"The transmission and reception issues are valuable."
"The solution is easy to install and use."
"The GUI is easy to use."
"The session-level filtering features are valuable."
"Being able to dissect email data and figure out what is inside email messages was the most valuable feature. Such a feature is pretty helpful for an ongoing forensic investigation or when there is a potential insider threat that you are trying to investigate. It allows you to see the network activity of the users you are investigating. It also gives you more visibility into your network. It was very easy to set up. There is a lot of information out there on Google and YouTube about how to use it. There is also community support. If you have any trouble, it is pretty easy to find an answer online. You will have to do some digging only if you have a very specific use case."
"The most valuable feature is the traffic gate, which shows which IPs are getting more bandwidth or traffic."
"What's best about Wireshark is that it doesn't require installation. It supports cards and monitoring permissions and is sufficient for appending and capturing activities. You won't need to install other tools to use Wireshark, so this saves you time. You can capture packets at any time from your laptop through Wireshark."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"We had some stability issues at the outset that have since been resolved."
"The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs."
"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."
"The main area for improvement for ManageEngine OpManager is its performance."
"ManageEngine OpManager could improve by having a better cloud presence."
"You cannot resolve 100 percent of the issues yourself. You would need to reach out to the support. It needs to be cheaper."
"They should add more features to URL monitoring."
"Real user and UI monitoring are not practical."
"We'd like to be able to extract the output into an Excel table."
"The solution’s user interface could be improved."
"Sometimes I need to use tcpdump when I need to check the packets on CLI."
"A room for improvement in Wireshark is its ease of use for beginners. It could be better. Another room for improvement in the tool is for it to provide more details about the traffic load. At the moment, Wireshark is adequate for me, so there isn't anything I'd like added to it in its next version."
"DNS could be improved."
"Whenever we select one of the packets, in terms of the number of bytes, for example, there are three planes, and in the detailed plane, I have to count the number of bytes manually."
"Wireshark could be improved by adding more monitoring features."
"The decryption of encrypted packets could be better."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 15th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews while Wireshark is ranked 4th in Network Troubleshooting with 61 reviews. ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0, while Wireshark is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wireshark writes "User-friendly with an easy setup and a nice interface". ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, Nagios XI and SCOM, whereas Wireshark is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios XI, Colasoft Capsa, SolarWinds NPM and ClearSight Analyzer.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
