We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Temenos Quantum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There's a lot of online knowledge on the solution, to the point where new users can basically teach themselves how to use the solution."
"I like the containerization of Azure."
"I like the galleries, which are really powerful."
"When compared with Microsoft Power Automate, it is a bit more mature, and we're able to build things pretty rapidly."
"Time to market is most valuable because you can make apps pretty fast. It also has pretty good integration."
"The most valuable feature is automized processes."
"The product has good usability, in terms of low-code applications."
"I would say that the most valuable features are the user interface, navigation, and business routes."
"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."
"I like the complete, professional social site."
"The best thing about Temenos Quantum is how it smoothly connects with Temenos Fabric. This simplifies our quantum application by handling identity, authentication, and security tasks seamlessly, saving us from extra coding."
"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."
"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."
"The most valuable features of Temenos Quantum are user-friendliness and customizability."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
"It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space."
"In terms of workflow automation, I believe that capabilities for creating the entire business process are required, or, at the very least, the option to model the business process, define complex business events, handle them, and route them to appropriate business stakeholders."
"It's easy to use."
"When it comes to PowerApps, debugging can be difficult at times. It would be beneficial to simplify it."
"PowerApps is still a bit new compared to a slightly more mature product such as OutSystems."
"The user interface is pretty good, although it is a little bit clunky and can be improved."
"The availability of templates needs to be improved. I understand that the ecosystem around it is still developing, but we need more templates. I would like the entire ecosystem around it to improve. I would recommend adding AI components. Even though we can always connect to Azure for AI components, they should slowly start looking at adding some AI components to PowerApps so that out-of-the-box learning can be applied to process flows. Salesforce has the Einstein layer that works along with license platforms. PowerApps should also have something similar."
"I would like to see more improvement, for example, in direct collaboration."
"We use GoCanvas to make forms. It's easier to make forms in GoCanvas, but Power Apps is cheaper because it is bundled with our Office 365 license. if I want to create a form in Power Apps, I need some knowledge, but GoCanvas is intuitive."
"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"
"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."
"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."
"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."
"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"
"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while Temenos Quantum is ranked 19th in Rapid Application Development Software with 15 reviews. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Temenos Quantum is most compared with OutSystems, Microsoft Azure App Service and ServiceNow. See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. Temenos Quantum report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.