We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and MuleSoft Composer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"It can scale."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"The stability could be better."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews while MuleSoft Composer is ranked 13th in Cloud Data Integration with 4 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while MuleSoft Composer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "Handles a wide variety of data sources and efficiently organizes and manages integration processes". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Zapier and Jitterbit Harmony . See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.