We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and Sales Creatio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."
"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"It is a scalable product."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"With Sales Creatio, you can have a customer service review, and it is GDPR compliant."
"Intuitive, low-code CRM platform that's easy to integrate and use."
"I like Creatio's workflows, automation, and no-code features that we can update as we wish."
"There's not a single CRM out there that is quite as flexible as Creatio CRM."
"Each step of the customer journey is recorded by certain metrics and KPIs. If you want to do a lot deeper dive with Excel pivot tables or third-party analytics tools like Qlik or Tableau, that's an option."
"Its configurability in terms of being able to change screens and fields and create workflows that are compatible with our business objectives is most valuable."
"It provides a customizable platform that enables companies to safely store and recognize customer data, as well as connect multiple channels and other related services."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."
"Out of the box connectors are great, but the ability of what is there versus other CRMs is limited."
"There is still some room for improvement in the overall look and feel of the software."
"To benefit from this software you need to have somebody dedicated to customizing the features you're looking for and, to be honest, I do not have time to focus only on that."
"On the sales side, I would like to see a CPQ product, and on the services side, I'd like to see more of a field service automation feature."
"Sales Creatio should include better customizations."
"Creatio's mobile app could be more intuitive."
"The marketing feature needs to be improved. Documentation on their website, or their knowledge base, also needs expansion and improvement."
"The biggest area of improvement for me is the mobile app. Creatio has moved towards this composable architecture and user interface, and it looks good and works well on a laptop or tablet. But the mobile app could be improved."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Sales Creatio is ranked 22nd in CRM with 8 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while Sales Creatio is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sales Creatio writes "Low-code, intuitive, and easy to use CRM platform". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi, whereas Sales Creatio is most compared with QuickBase, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Oracle Fusion Service, Zoho CRM and Salesforce Sales Cloud.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
