We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"Provides the ability to automate SharePoint processes (building sites, lists, updating content). You can also automate document and content processes, onboarding and offboarding, and general IT and HR solutions."
"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."
"The technical support is very good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."
"Allows us to provide desktop/laptop and mobile solutions to our users."
"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."
"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."
"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."
"Currently, we're using this solution for the integration server which helps us to integrate with the mainframe."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"How simple it is to create new solutions."
"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."
"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"It is quite expensive."
"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."
"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi iPaaS. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
