We compared Siebel CRM and Pipedrive across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Siebel CRM is known for its strength and adaptability. Users like its ready-made industry verticals and comprehensive workflows. Pipedrive is notable for its visually appealing interface, customizability, and insightful reporting. Customers also praised its versatile automation capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Siebel CRM users say could be simpler and more customizable customization guidance, user interface, mobile app, support, backend performance, and cost reduction. Pipedrive should focus on improving ERP integration, documentation, and artificial intelligence.
Service and Support: Some customers appreciated Siebel’s advanced support, while others were dissatisfied with slow response times and had difficulty contacting the support team. Pipedrive's customer service has received mostly positive feedback. Users valued the vendor’s prompt responses and helpful assistance.
Ease of Deployment: Users have reported that the initial setup process for Siebel CRM is challenging. Pipedrive's setup is described as simple, straightforward, and user-friendly.
Pricing: Customers find the setup cost of Siebel CRM to be expensive and a cause for concern. Pipedrive offers a reasonable and cost-effective pricing structure, making it a suitable choice for moderately sized companies.
ROI: Siebel CRM provides distinct features that are not found in other CRMs, resulting in a favorable return on investment. Pipedrive offers great value for the cost. Added features like document solutions and e-signature, making it a worthwhile investment.
Comparison Results: Siebel CRM is highly regarded for its versatility and ability to accommodate a diverse user base. At the same time, it’s also criticized for its complicated setup, and users say it’s difficult to navigate. Pipedrive is a cost-effective solution, and users say it’s easy to track progress with Pipedrive’s visual interface. Reviewers say that Pipedrive could integrate more seamlessly with ERP solutions and leverage artificial intelligence better.
"The usability of the solution is its valuable feature."
"The solution is pretty easy to use and intuitive."
"It's very flexible and we can really fit it into our business model."
"It is a stable platform."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most useful stuff for me is that it's very flexible with all the data structures...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Pipedrive makes it easy to understand who I'm talking to at a glance. It has all the activities, node features, opportunity interface, deal interface, and time drive deals.The sales process is extremely simple, which saves me time and energy. I can send the document for e-signature and make the most out of my deals. I can automatically send emails and phone calls. You need to do only a little API programming. It offers massive flexibility. You can run an entire enterprise on the platform. The ease of use facilitates huge adoption."
"Pipedrive's most valuable feature is reporting and insights. The CRM shows the database and lets the salespeople arrange their daily activities. The insights are essential from a management point of view because it helps the sales staff improve or adjust their whole sales cycle, activities, and quality."
"Siebel CRM is used for distributing information between systems, trouble ticketing, and case management."
"Siebel is easy to configure and comes with various pre-built industry verticals, so it doesn't require much effort. If you want to roll out Siebel in telecom or manufacturing, they have the verticals."
"The best thing about the tool is its data model. The underlying data model refers to how the data is stored in databases. We can also experience the ease of developing anything with the tool. We can customize any functionality as per any business challenge."
"Siebel offers a high level of customization which has been valuable. The solution also offers the ability to model complex products."
"The solution's order management pack is quite fantastic."
"It is quite robust and flexible. You can develop almost anything you want. You go into the tools, and you can do anything you want."
"The tool's complaint management feature is very good. We used a CRM before, which lacked the integrations, so complaints had to be handled manually. With Siebel CRM, we have better integrations and can resolve complaints with a few clicks. When you're in the service industry, tasks matter a lot, especially when you have to access multiple systems to address issues. Being a bank, we currently have around 17 operational systems. It's not feasible to expect users to access them individually to make the necessary changes."
"Due to the many features that are built in from a CRM perspective, it is the best product we have."
"Pipedrive could be more efficient. I want the management to be more transparent so it's easier to monitor the sales team's activities and results and do business forecasting. It would help them to improve the quality of the sales cycle."
"The automation process is challenging."
"The product is expensive."
"The form builder works even though it has some shortcomings...Also, the forms don't have the ability to avoid or stop people from signing up if they don't have a corporate email."
"We are using the lowest version of it. As we become more sophisticated, we might outgrow the tool, but there are features that are available in the higher-level versions, which I'm unfamiliar with, that might be able to meet the needs we would have in the future. They can maybe add some of the features to the basic version or make it more reasonably priced or free."
"The platform could be even more robust."
"The tool's APIs are challenging. It should also be compliant with HIPAA, FINRA and GLBA. The data centers should be within US so that they are compliant with regulations."
"In future releases, I would like to have a highly intelligent integration service where you can easily connect PipeDrive with other tools, even if you are not a developer."
"Siebel is pricey compared to other CRM tools. That's the problem. Although it's a highly stable and functionally rich application, customers are not willing to pay that price for it. Customers can find CRM software that gives them similar functionality at a lower price. There are so many others on the market like Salesforce."
"The solution itself is very heavy."
"The documentation needs to be improved."
"However, there are areas that this product has not evolved at par with global industry trends, including the UX/UI and cloud capabilities."
"The backend performance of Siebel could be improved as it is often slow. In addition, the Open UI is not that responsive."
"The tool took a lot of time to deploy."
"The problem with Siebel is that everything is customizable in it. It's probably over-engineered, which makes it difficult to use, and it makes it difficult for the users to get started with the system."
"Currently, Siebel CRM is not helping the agent provide faster feedback to the customer."
Pipedrive is ranked 13th in CRM with 11 reviews while Siebel CRM is ranked 5th in CRM with 17 reviews. Pipedrive is rated 8.2, while Siebel CRM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Pipedrive writes " An easy- to- use and scalable cloud-based CRM tool for managing and tracking". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Siebel CRM writes "Comes with complaint management feature but improvement is needed in UI ". Pipedrive is most compared with Apollo.io, monday.com and Real Estate CRM, whereas Siebel CRM is most compared with Microsoft Dynamics CRM, SAP CRM, Oracle CRM, Oracle CX Sales and Salesforce Sales Cloud. See our Pipedrive vs. Siebel CRM report.
See our list of best CRM vendors and best Local Government CRM vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.