We compared Zabbix and PRTG Network Monitor based on our users' reviews across several parameters. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Zabbix is praised for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customizable alerting system, and extensive reporting options, while users appreciate PRTG Network Monitor for its user-friendly interface, scalable performance, and detailed reporting capabilities. Zabbix's customer service is highly rated, while PRTG users find the software more intuitive and quicker to set up. Both products offer reasonable pricing and valuable ROI, with opportunities for improvement in user interface and customization features.
Features: Zabbix offers customizable alerting system, extensive reporting options, and comprehensive monitoring capabilities. PRTG Network Monitor is praised for its ease of setting up, scalability for larger networks, and ability to tailor alerts based on specific criteria.
Pricing and ROI: Zabbix does not have setup costs, making it easy to get started, while PRTG Network Monitor has minimal setup costs. Users find Zabbix's licensing flexible and suitable. PRTG Network Monitor offers good value for the cost with scalable licensing options. Zabbix users have reported positive outcomes and benefits. PRTG Network Monitor users found the software cost-effective and efficient, providing valuable insights for network management.
Room for Improvement: Zabbix has room for improvement in user interface, scalability, and performance, while PRTG Network Monitor could enhance its user interface, customization options, alerting features, and integration capabilities.
Deployment and customer support: Users find PRTG Network Monitor quicker and simpler to deploy and set up compared to Zabbix, which may require more time and effort for implementation. Zabbix's customer service is praised for its promptness, effectiveness, and expertise. Users appreciate the knowledgeable and responsive support team. PRTG Network Monitor's customer service is also highly acclaimed for prompt responses, helpful guidance, and a reliable support team.
The summary above is based on 77 interviews we conducted recently with Zabbix and PRTG Network Monitor users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The most valuable features of PRTG Network Monitor are bandwidth utilization, user-friendliness, all past report simple retrievals, and timeout features. Additionally, if the solution does go down it is simple to bring it back."
"The reporting module is easy to configure."
"Ability to create a dashboard inside software monitoring."
"Nice product with an easy interface to use and a large variety of sensors."
"Good compilation of the system's information."
"The product is simple and easy to implement."
"Technical support has been very helpful so far."
"PRTG is integrated on Windows."
"The solution is stable."
"The features I found most valuable are the user interface and a wide range of network devices that are easy to configure."
"Like other common Linux distributions, some of the most valuable features of this solution are the ease of use and deployment. It's simple and has a lot of packages and a lot of software."
"The initial setup was not complex."
"The performance and bandwidth are valuable features."
"It has improved our server performance monitoring overall. We know right away when there are problems. It has built-in statistics, so we can go back and see if there's spiking. We can check what's happening every day around the same time and check the configuration to see if there's something that's running and needs to be fixed."
"The most valuable features of Zabbix are flexibility and a single interface for different types of monitoring."
"The flexibility of this solution is amazing."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"There seems to be a big jump from the basic scan to the really thorough scan. There is a big jump in the quantity of sensors it uses for certain things. One minute you might get ten and then the next you get 200. There seems to be a big jump between the two at times."
"Its price can be better. Its price is a problem for us because it is in dollars, and there is a high conversion rate. In terms of new features, it can have BGP monitoring. It should also have a dashboard and maps editor."
"Needs ability to monitor standard notification time (notify after X time)."
"Integration into service management ticketing systems could be better. They should simplify the integration into big service management platforms like ServiceNow, Remedy, and Cherwell. They're really into monitoring, but they don't do any self-resolution. It would be better if the company moved more into the AIOps space so that you could actually kick off some remedies. I know that you can execute some commands from the tool, but you need to develop those all yourself. It would be really handy if they had some auto-remedy scripts that they could develop on top."
"PRTG's documentation could be improved."
"The clustering aspect needs improvement, as there is a bit of confusion about you do when hit that 5000 probe mark."
"While the desktop app is good, they could slightly improve it. We would like it to be a single pane of glass. At the moment, you can only see certain portions of information. You have to scroll through to make it more granular. We want them to develop the desktop app to be more user-friendly."
"Their penetration within the market could be much better. If their pricing was lower, even though it's reasonable now, it might help them achieve this."
"They should open an SSH session from the web interface."
"The dashboard and the graph section could be a little bit more professional."
"I think the reporting part of Zabbix can be improved in terms of more user-friendly graphics to display the collected data. Many simple users who don't know how to use Zabbix properly might get confused by the reporting, although at the same time it is very versatile for my company."
"It would be helpful if they translated the documentation to Cyrillic languages."
"Zabbix is not easy to configure, and upgrading is also an issue."
"We had some scalability issues with a large number of nodes."
"Documentation terminology could be improved."
"The GUI could be more intuitive. Also, we'd like streaming telemetry. Zabbix might have this feature, but I haven't seen it yet. It took us a long time to get started because the documentation isn't very descriptive. We had to go through various sources like YouTube and forums to get this solution working."
PRTG Network Monitor is ranked 5th in Network Monitoring Software with 96 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. PRTG Network Monitor is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PRTG Network Monitor writes "It's an all-in-one solution, and net flow is included in the licensing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". PRTG Network Monitor is most compared with Centreon, Nagios XI, SolarWinds NPM, ManageEngine OpManager and Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Elastic Observability. See our PRTG Network Monitor vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
