We performed a comparison between RSA SecurID and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."It is a scalable solution."
"One of the most valuable feature is the ID soft token and hard token."
"I would say that the two-factor authentication and the ease of installation and configuration are the most valuable features of this solution."
"I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things."
"The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment."
"I like IdentityIQ's granular attachment management and certification customization features."
"This solution has made our team more effective. We need less manual approvals when someone new joins our company. There is less paperwork and fewer support tickets raised for access."
"The tool is quite stable and user-friendly."
"The solution is pretty stable and simple to use."
"The support is very good."
"It is simple and easy to implement."
"Certifications and user provisioning features are the most valuable."
"The community is very active and when I had questions about an issue, I was able to find the resources."
"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based."
"Sometimes, we encounter issues with other applications that are not compatible with RSA SecurID Access and require expert troubleshooting. At those times, we need additional support from an implementation perspective. This is an area where Oracle can improve as there is no substitute for reliable and efficient support."
"It doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility."
"The interface needs to improve a lot. It should be easier to manage and navigate."
"The UI is complex."
"The cost can be prohibitive for middle-tier companies."
"It allowed to implement the automated processes when a new employee is hired. It allows to have a main central process for new hires."
"The price of IdentityIQ could be lower. There are additional costs when you buy the licenses, and they force the customers to pay for them."
"It is too technical. You need really good technical skills in Java and other technologies, which are hard to find. If they can make it easier so that things can be done with a few clicks, it will be great."
"The user interface could be slightly improved. It could be made simpler and more user-friendly, however, it is good enough right now."
"Some setups should be done in the interface and in the code, and could be made simpler."
"There are various functions that don't work in IdentityIQ, including the access request reminder, which doesn't go to the approvals in the proper format, so it's hard for users to read."
RSA SecurID is ranked 8th in Authentication Systems with 9 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 61 reviews. RSA SecurID is rated 7.8, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of RSA SecurID writes "Enhanced security, reliable, helpful technical support, and easy to install". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". RSA SecurID is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, PingID, Fortinet FortiToken and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, Microsoft Entra ID, One Identity Manager, ForgeRock and Okta Workforce Identity.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.