We performed a comparison between Acronis Cyber Protect and Code42 Incydr based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is exceptional for desktop backup."
"In our recent experiences, Acronis Cyber Protect proved most valuable during instances of colleagues facing migration challenges due to ransomware impacts. In these situations, where servers and backups were affected, having a backup stored in external drives or other devices within our data centers posed risks. To address this vulnerability, we decided to shift to a cloud backup solution."
"The most valuable feature is the fact that you can archive backups quite easily and minimize the amount of space you're using."
"In my opinion, it's the best product for end-users and PCs."
"I've reimaged servers and been back up and running in exactly no time with the completely new hardware."
"It works with different types of partitions or different OSs."
"In terms of system-critical support, Acronis' technical support does really well. I would give them an eight out of ten for that."
"The ability to clone backups."
"Works in the background and users are able to perform restores."
"Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable."
"Low system overhead, setting retention policies, ease of use"
"t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan."
"Security tools: Being able to monitor data going in and coming off our endpoints. Seeing what it is and where it's going is awesome."
"Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details."
"It has quite a bit of flexibility in configuring backup sets."
"There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure."
"If there was a wizard that would lead you down a road, when creating a backup, that would probably be better than having to go online or call somebody to actually do a backup. It's not intuitive..."
"There are some limitations to the backup."
"Some of the default settings out-of-the-box should already be set up for the novice user. For instance, the warnings that say a hard drive has bad sectors and stops the backup from performing."
"I have no suggestions for improvements as I have only used the product for a month and have yet to really discover all of its aspects."
"There are a lot of products out there that are a little bit stronger than Acronis where AV is concerned."
"Acronis Backup can improve on the virtualization backups because they are not as good as Veeam Backup."
"The backing up of virtual machines in VMware and Nutanix needs better integration and the performance of the solution needs improvement."
"It would be nice if it could support more types of storage: EMC, HPE, Veeam, etc."
"What I think could be improved is how I get support."
"I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin."
"Reporting could use an overhaul. It is very limited."
"You can't always filter out data that you'd like to."
"Java, please get rid of Java."
"More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD)."
"The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."
"I think one we can improve is the compression."
Acronis Cyber Protect is ranked 10th in Backup and Recovery with 25 reviews while Code42 Incydr is ranked 30th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews. Acronis Cyber Protect is rated 8.2, while Code42 Incydr is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Acronis Cyber Protect writes "A single solution protecting all platforms, that is highly secure, and easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Code42 Incydr writes "Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support". Acronis Cyber Protect is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud, Azure Backup and N-able Cove Data Protection, whereas Code42 Incydr is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Threat Detection, Investigation & Response (TDIR) Platform, Morphisec and Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365. See our Acronis Cyber Protect vs. Code42 Incydr report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.