We performed a comparison between Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, ESET and others in Anti-Malware Tools."The malware feature is most valuable."
"It integrates very well with all Windows workstations or other Microsoft Endpoint products. It also works quite well. So far, I have not had any issue that hasn't been sorted out. It doesn't use too many resources, so you don't have to install different things."
"Provides good vulnerability assessment."
"Ensures that I'm working with a product that gets updated regularly without me having to remember to do it. Since it's a Microsoft product, I'm confident that it requires a low use of system resources. The benefit of that being that my computer isn't constantly being drained."
"We have just started to implement it. It is useful for protection from malware and ransomware."
"The solution has good performance, I have not seen a problem."
"One of the valuable features of the solution is the small updates that keep my machine relatively clean from any infections."
"There are a couple of features, such as isolating the devices or connecting the device and connecting live response."
"The solution's latest features for threat analysis are updated to provide us with future protection against the latest threats worldwide."
"The configuration needs improvement."
"It would be helpful if they offered video tutorial guides."
"More integration with different platforms is an area for improvement for this product, and should be included in its next release."
"We would like to see more tools for managing on-premises security... Sometimes, we have the tools, like Defender, to manage security in the cloud, but because we are so focused on the cloud, we forget the fact that we need to be sure about the security of the on-premises environment, specifically Active Directory."
"The anti-ransomware features need to be improved upon."
"In India at least, it seems to be a bit more expensive than other options."
"It would be nice to have a paid upgrade that would provide additional screening of the day-to-day activities."
"From an audit point of view, our auditors would like to have more reports on how things are used, if things go wrong, and how they went wrong. For example, if something got a warning, "Why?" So, we would like more versatility for tracing and reporting. That would improve the product, as long as the user interface doesn't get bogged down."
"Microsoft should improve support for third-party platforms, because not all functionality is available for all of them. It's a good product, but they should just extend the functionality for all platforms."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office is ranked 32nd in Anti-Malware Tools with 1 review while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Anti-Malware Tools with 182 reviews. Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office writes "Malware feature is valuable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
