We performed a comparison between Acumatica and SAP S/4HANA Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution supports multiple branches."
"The way everything integrated well with everything else was most valuable. We had one solution for everything, from the first phone call down to follow-up visits for wholesale callers and for just regular purchases."
"I like S/4HANA's automated features, readymade processes, and user interface. It supports various processes required by large international companies, like logistics, procurement, payments, sales, etc. All of these features were available in previous SAP solutions, but HANA has an updated user interface and improved integration with other systems. The readymade processes make HANA a good option if you're adopting a greenfield approach."
"It is a straightforward solution."
"The manufacturing area is a good feature."
"Managing the server and taking advantage of the services provided by SAP itself is the most valuable feature."
"What I like the most about SAP S4HANA is how reliable and powerful it is."
"Both standard and customized integrations work well with no issues."
"The guidance SAP offers for implementing the product is clear and the online resources are great."
"The solution links everything and allows us to integrate into our entire supply chain."
"The solution doesn't have features to break down the structure for multiple people in the project."
"For support, we go through a distributor, and the support we receive from them is much better than what we would from Acumatica directly. When we went to Acumatica support directly, we were not happy with it."
"We should be able to personalize it for the company. There should be more customization of the pages so that they seem more like a company rather than as an outside company. We should be able to change company images and things like that and do this kind of personalization."
"The scalability of SAP S/4HANNA is an area that could be improved."
"One thing that could be better in SAP S/4HANA Cloud, especially in the public cloud, is how easily you can make changes."
"UX design is not flexible and lacks compatibility with mobile devices."
"I would like to see a feature where it allows integration with more platforms."
"It is a complicated solution. So it should be easier to use."
"I need more options for enhancing the system, especially compared to the features available in the on-premise version."
"The price is mainly suitable for larger companies, even then, there may be other, cheaper solutions. Additionally, this solution is the result of multiple acquisitions leaving room for there to be issues with performance."
"SAP S4HANA Cloud's production planning screens could be improved."
Acumatica is ranked 6th in Cloud ERP with 3 reviews while SAP S/4HANA Cloud is ranked 3rd in Cloud ERP with 41 reviews. Acumatica is rated 8.0, while SAP S/4HANA Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Acumatica writes "Provided one solution for everything and housed everything for us". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA Cloud writes "A valuable tool for businesses seeking to enhance their overall performance and competitiveness in the digital era". Acumatica is most compared with NetSuite ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, HubSpot CRM, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and SAP Business ByDesign, whereas SAP S/4HANA Cloud is most compared with SAP Business ByDesign, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP Business One, IFS Cloud Platform and Plex Manufacturing Cloud ERP. See our Acumatica vs. SAP S/4HANA Cloud report.
See our list of best Cloud ERP vendors.
We monitor all Cloud ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
