Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BOC Group Logo
1,338 views|902 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Ardoq Logo
1,180 views|915 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ADOIT and Ardoq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Architecture Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool allows us to track the life cycle of products and resources. When the metadata is set up correctly, we can see where things are in their life cycle and how they fit into our processes. It helps us understand which core processes are active and whether any underlying elements need renewal. We can also keep tabs on the costs.""It helps me to model the architecture at an enterprise level."

More ADOIT Pros →

"Snapshots are the most valuable feature.""It is a stable solution."

More Ardoq Pros →

Cons
"The tool's data lineage could be enhanced. It would be great to see the data flow and understand where it's going within the system.""We need to understand how the data could be segregated."

More ADOIT Cons →

"Scalability as a standalone system is good, given the information that has been described inside Ardoq. But not the scalability as a third-party system or with integration with other systems. Because in this direction, the scalability is about zero for Ardoq.""The training environment wasn't very intuitive, but maybe with more use, it will get better."

More Ardoq Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I use ADOIT's open-source version."
  • More ADOIT Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We pay for extended support."
  • More Ardoq Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Hi @Cheryl Joseph ​Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then… more »
    Top Answer:Here is a comparison of Ardoq and Sparx Systems, two popular Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) tools Ardoq Pros: o Ardoq has a user-friendly interface that makes it easy to create and… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,338
    Comparisons
    902
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,180
    Comparisons
    915
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    448
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    LeanIX logo
    Compared 50% of the time.
    MEGA HOPEX logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    BiZZdesign HoriZZon logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    LeanIX logo
    Compared 32% of the time.
    BiZZdesign HoriZZon logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    MEGA HOPEX logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    ADOIT Enterprise Architecture suite is users' best-rated tool for deriving data-driven insights and architecture analysis, trusted by SMEs and large corporations worldwide. ADOIT helps you to take smart and fast decisions, manage digital portfolios, discover cross-functional dependencies and drive growth. ADOIT is intuitive, powerful, and flexible. It is the ultimate way to do EA. You can start building your outcome-driven EA initiative already today, as the cloud-based ADOIT:Community Edition is available for free. For more information please visit: www.boc-group.com/en/adoit

    A Dynamic and Data-Driven Approach to Enterprise Architecture
    Engage and connect stakeholders across the organization with business-friendly visualizations understandable to all.

    Sample Customers
    Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: Volksbank Vienna, Austrian Ministry of Finance, Hilti
    Schibsted, Government of Malmo, Torvald
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Retailer9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Architecture Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ADOIT is ranked 21st in Enterprise Architecture Management with 2 reviews while Ardoq is ranked 11th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 2 reviews. ADOIT is rated 9.0, while Ardoq is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ADOIT writes "Helps to track the life cycle of products and services, and understand their costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ardoq writes "Provides stable performance and scalability but not intuitive for data modeling". ADOIT is most compared with LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, MEGA HOPEX and BiZZdesign HoriZZon, whereas Ardoq is most compared with LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, BiZZdesign HoriZZon, MEGA HOPEX and erwin Data Modeler by Quest.

    See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.