We performed a comparison between ADP Streamline and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Benefits Administration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature was that everything was in one system."
"The advantage was that ADP Streamline was inherently designed to serve as a marketing engine for the company."
"I like the reporting feature as it allows me to generate reports independently without relying on a payroll consultant."
"They are very strong in terms of having a central regional system. A regional person can see and monitor the calendar for each different country."
"Payroll processing is my favorite HCM feature, and I like all the SuccessFactors talent modules also. SAP is making good progress on enhancements to the features in the SF modules."
"The tool's most valuable features for our HR operations include easy reporting capabilities, which allow us to generate reports for management meetings and auditing purposes. Additionally, it supports appointment preparation and processing benefits."
"The valuable features of SAP HCM include managing employee data from hiring to retirement."
"SAP HCM has valuable features for analytics data management."
"We've found that the solution has the capability to scale."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"It has the best data management features."
"The UI could be improved to be a bit more modern or trendy because it looks old-fashioned compared to other systems."
"They could improve the service relationship manager (SRM), because they have an SRM which is not familiar with Simple."
"I think there is a need for a deeper level of comprehension."
"Having more clear guidance on design and training would be beneficial."
"The speed of technical support can be improved."
"It would be nice if the solution migrated to S/4HANA."
"This solution needs to be more configurable and user-friendly."
"The talent modules are lacking in HCM, so I would recommend switching to SuccessFactors for talent management, but HCM excels at time management and payroll."
"The organizational structure visualization could be improved in future releases. The solution has a very poor interface."
"SAP HCM cannot integrate with other third-party applications. One of the drawbacks we encounter with SAP HCM, specifically in payroll management, is the limitation regarding changing payroll areas within the same month. For instance, if an employee transitions from staff to non-staff status during the month, we face difficulties because the system doesn't allow us to change the payroll."
"There needs to be a renovation of the interface and functionalities of the talent management modules."
"System usability is a challenge."
ADP Streamline is ranked 11th in Benefits Administration with 7 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 4th in Benefits Administration with 46 reviews. ADP Streamline is rated 8.4, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ADP Streamline writes "Simplifies payroll processing and reduces the need for extensive marketing efforts while providing scalability, compliance, and excellent stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Efficiently handles the entire hire-to-retire cycle management within an organization and the ability to scale is outstanding". ADP Streamline is most compared with ADP GlobalView Payroll, ADP Global Payroll, UKG and ADP Workforce Now, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and PeopleSoft. See our ADP Streamline vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Benefits Administration vendors.
We monitor all Benefits Administration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.