We performed a comparison between Akamai mPulse and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Enables dynamic injections from within the product which is great."
"The most valuable feature is the solutions overall performance. It is very efficient and accurate for our usage."
"The synthetic alert is the most valuable feature in New Relic APM. I also like the time travel feature and find traceability useful in the solution. New Relic APM also has good response times."
"It has in-depth analysis using developer code for someone whose not traditionally a developer."
"The stability of New Relic APM is very good."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It is easy to track and easy to follow."
"Sometimes, I monitor the user's time of response and use this information to improve the number of servers on the back-end. Or, I can use it to change my back log for front-end developers and improve their response times. It's very important in this case because I can improve the experience of the final user."
"It has helped my organization to dive deeper into the application using the APM module is very helpful."
"We were able to integrate with the messaging tool, Slack, which meant that we got notifications whenever something was not quite right."
"Their technical support is pretty good and responsive. We have a real good relationship with them."
"In the next release, I would like to see the possibility of sharing the metric from this solution with other solutions."
"The end-to-end distributor tracing connectivity isn't there."
"I would like to be able to invest less time in IT and ad hocs. We should be concentrating on other issues."
"There were some settings we had issues with."
"New Relic APM is a good tool, and it has a database of failures, but it could use a list of customer-specific failures. New Relic APM should be able to give my company advanced analytics through AI."
"The solution only supports the cloud platform and not on-premises."
"The solution must provide better support for Azure Web Apps service."
"There are times when you restart the engines and the servers have a unique ID for the host and you need to remove the server. It is difficult because some are on-premise and others are production hosts. Having downtime is not very good when updating. However, it is not a constant issue."
"How granular I could go down at looking at certain data, especially related to the operations, is limited."
"The price needs improvement."
Akamai mPulse is ranked 51st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 151 reviews. Akamai mPulse is rated 6.6, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Akamai mPulse writes "Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Akamai mPulse is most compared with Dynatrace, Grafana, Datadog, AppDynamics and Sentry, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Azure Monitor.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.