We performed a comparison between Akamai mPulse and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Enables dynamic injections from within the product which is great."
"The most valuable feature is the solutions overall performance. It is very efficient and accurate for our usage."
"This solution provides valuable insights into the health of our infrastructure in real time."
"Grafana has improved our analysis capability to solve an issue, increasing the co-working between IT services and business services."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"Almost any kind of visualization is possible with Grafana and all dashboards are configurable."
"Kubernetes could help us to better visualize the trend of our data by recording and displaying our history over a chosen duration, such as the last 30 days."
"The best thing about Grafana is the visualization. The colors and the ease of use make it very user-friendly."
"Grafana is a very scalable product. It's a really good product."
"Grafana is able to connect with multiple data sources, unlike Elasticsearch."
"In the next release, I would like to see the possibility of sharing the metric from this solution with other solutions."
"The end-to-end distributor tracing connectivity isn't there."
"More dashboard is required, out-of-the-box, for OpenNMS."
"Lacks event management which affects our DevOps people."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"The formatting could be better."
"Trigger limits are difficult to see in a graph."
"I had issues with the solution's configuration part."
"Writing queries can be a bit difficult because the syntax must be maintained."
"It can take a considerable amount of time to learn the graphs if a long duration is selected."
Akamai mPulse is ranked 53rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews. Akamai mPulse is rated 6.6, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Akamai mPulse writes "Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". Akamai mPulse is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, Datadog, AppDynamics and Sentry, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability. See our Akamai mPulse vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.