We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a stable solution with an uptime of 99.99 percent."
"API Gateway offers a multitude of configuration parameters that enable versatile request filtering and protection against potential attacks."
"It is easy to set up. It is also quick to deploy."
"It's flexible. It was valuable."
"All information and data needs to be sanitized before it enters a private domain and we use this solution to do this."
"It is a stable solution."
"The solution is solid, robust, and scalable."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"The solution is scalable."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"It would be useful to have a more complete development environment for the developer, with different integrative capabilities to manage all the life cycles for the API. I think the full version formula for that is really useful. They should improve the development environment for easier integration."
"When it comes to DDoS protection, I would like to see that become available at the API Gateway level."
"The API Gateway lacks the capability to directly facilitate API strategy development or user onboarding workflows."
"I believe better governance and monitoring features would be beneficial."
"From a use cases perspective, you need to have an internal and external gateway. AWS can only handle external traffic so has to be used together with another solution."
"They could include more support tools in the product."
"Amazon API Gateway is not as complete as Apigee and needs to be improved by adding more features to become a more robust application."
"We would like to see more UI-based monitoring."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
Amazon API Gateway is ranked 3rd in API Management with 37 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Easy initial setup and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, WSO2 API Manager and Layer7 API Management, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and webMethods API Gateway. See our Amazon API Gateway vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.