We performed a comparison between SAP Cloud Platform and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It’s great that we have the entire suite of SAP at our fingertips."
"The product is very stable."
"I found flexibility most valuable in the SAP Cloud Platform. It's a simple tool that's good even for first-time users."
"SAP has provided very good support."
"The solution can scale."
"The pre-delivered content from the SAP cloud platform is definitely a strength."
"We primarily utilize SAP's ERP capabilities."
"The mapping transformation allows us to connect our on-premise ECC to the cloud system."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"The solution is scalable."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"The main problem is that there aren't any easy migrations from SAP PO to SAP CPI, so from process orchestration to cloud platform integration."
"We need to connect our ERP solution via the VPN. We need to make sure our ERP solutions aren't exposed to the outside world. Our teams really struggle with this."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I'd like to see more local integration."
"I would like for it to have integration to GitHub."
"When I started looking at the client's IT architecture, I started by doing a study of their services, DVM, data volume, and management services. According to the results, they could be a lot better at this."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvements with the price and the licensing."
"When they innovate too fast, they end up confusing their customers."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 38 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 12th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews. SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Mule Anypoint Platform and Mendix, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Amazon API Gateway. See our SAP Cloud Platform vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.