We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Virtuozzo Application Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's highly scalable. It's guaranteed 99.99% uptime, and it shows you can scale up or scale out whenever you need more space."
"The most valuable features of Amazon AWS are the EC2 instance for web applications with CDN Networks."
"Stable platform with a straightforward setup. It's user-friendly, with more reliable servers compared to the competition."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
"They release new solutions almost every quarter and you don't get that kind of innovation from an enterprise company."
"Cloud Trail API log storage."
"Setting up AWS was pretty easy. It was straightforward to set up, and it took us a year to develop and migrate our mobile banking solution to the AWS cloud. Our migration experience was quite positive."
"The solution also helps organizations to move applications to a containerized platform."
"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."
"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."
"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."
"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."
"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."
"Amazon AWS is a very poor product for students. Microsoft Azure is a better solution."
"The technical support can take longer than expected sometimes. They could improve on this."
"One of the problems that I have seen is that some of the products are not as mature as others."
"The pricing could be a bit high at times. It's something they could improve upon."
"The invoicing procedure of Amazon AWS needs to be improved. It can be difficult to manage."
"We would appreciate it if the product was cheaper."
"The pricing of AWS is very unclear. They make it quite confusing."
"Recently we had a long conversation about functionality that is missing in Alexa — in Mexico, specifically. Alexa for Business is a service and platform that Americans can use to make a call to an Amazon Echo device or a telephone via the app. But in Mexico, we are not allowed to use that technology. This is a significant disadvantage of AWS for those living in Mexico."
"The backup functionality needs to be improved."
"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."
"Lacks better integration into enterprise storage products."
"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."
"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."
More Virtuozzo Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while Virtuozzo Application Platform is ranked 15th in PaaS Clouds with 7 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Virtuozzo Application Platform is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Virtuozzo Application Platform writes "A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup ". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Virtuozzo Application Platform is most compared with Microsoft Azure, OpenShift, SAP Cloud Platform, VMware Tanzu Application Service and DigitalOcean. See our Amazon AWS vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.