Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs Google Cloud Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
447 views|315 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Google Logo
3,188 views|2,206 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) and Google Cloud Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Storage solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs. Google Cloud Storage Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The durability and snapshot capabilities are good.""The most valuable feature of the solution is backup...Amazon EBS is a very good product since it is very easy to enhance or increase and migrate your servers immediately, in a matter of seconds.""Amazon EBS is a storage system, and the storage is attached to the servers.""One of the most valuable was snapshots. There were scenarios in which the whole EC2 crashed, or we were unable to use it for some time, but the data on the mounted volumes were crucial to us. So, at that time, snapshots were very helpful.""When I have to change the operating system or delete a host, I can store the data in EBS or assign it to another host.""The solution provides big space that is reasonably priced.""The tool has different types of volumes, like SSD and HDD.""When it comes to valuable features, ease of use would be number one."

More Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Pros →

"I could store any type of file using the solution.""Some of the most valuable features are how convenient and easy to use this solution is. It's very user-friendly and meets all my requirements.""Google Cloud Storage's most valuable features are that it's easy to use and navigate, and it's not expensive.""It's user-friendly. We find it to be very easy to use.""The solution is stable and has good performance.""The most valuable features are Pub/Sub, Data Explorer, BigQuery, and Data Transfer.""The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is the shared folder.""We are satisfied with the parameters of Google Cloud Storage."

More Google Cloud Storage Pros →

Cons
"It would be better to analyze and find a way to merge both the file systems of Linux and Windows.""The cost of using EBS is high compared to other cloud vendors such as Tencent Cloud or CARI Cloud. Some costs are generated immediately and some are likely to increase.""In Amazon EBS, it is difficult to reduce the space chosen by the customer. The cost increases the moment the size of the storage increases, and I will have to pay for two TB of the tool instead of one TB.""There is room for improvement in terms of file storage. Recently, we had a scenario in which, in a file share, we had increased the IOPS capacity; this was for the production environment.""The initial setup is not easy.""Amazon EBS needs to improve its user interface for data transactions.""The setup could be easier.""The initial setup process is easy."

More Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Cons →

"The tool should be cheaper.""The cost of additional storage could be cheaper.""The solution only allows so much space for free.""It could be made even more secure and allow for more storage.""The solution is good, however, it would benefit from increased storage without the additional cost.""There are inefficiencies with cache when the names are sequencing.""I'm not really comfortable with the user interface because I don't use it very often.""The tool should increase its storage."

More Google Cloud Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "What I want Amazon to do is lower the price."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is low price, and ten is high, I rate the price a seven."
  • "The product is low-priced than other solutions."
  • "It is a cost-effective solution."
  • "You need to pay additional costs for support."
  • "The pricing models may be for general purposes, such as Amazon EBS Provisioned IOPS Volume or Amazon EBS Cold HDD Volumes."
  • "The solution is quite costly."
  • More Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "They know that the pricing is comparable with Azure, AWS, and those other solutions like Amazon are cheaper, but they are not as flexible."
  • "Better pricing would be helpful."
  • "Its price is fine."
  • "It's about nearly $10,000 USD to use the services on GCP, however, Google gave us a good deal which is why we originally went with them."
  • "The solution is free."
  • "They have recently changed their pricing structures, it used to be free but now it is a paid service. However, I am on a monthly subscription and the price is reasonable."
  • "The price could be cheaper."
  • "The price of the license could be cheaper. We are on an annual subscription."
  • More Google Cloud Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, which… more »
    Top Answer:The durability and snapshot capabilities are good.
    Top Answer:The solution is quite costly. There was an instance when we were not using 50 volumes. They were available and were costing us even though we were not using them. We ran a script to delete them. It's… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is nominal for us as we are a charitable organization. We pay a monthly subscription fee.
    Top Answer:The solution’s stability could be improved.
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 52 in Cloud Storage
    Views
    447
    Comparisons
    315
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    451
    Rating
    8.7
    2nd
    out of 52 in Cloud Storage
    Views
    3,188
    Comparisons
    2,206
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) provides persistent block level storage volumes for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud.  Each Amazon EBS volume is automatically replicated within its Availability Zone to protect you from component failure, offering high availability and durability. Amazon EBS volumes offer the consistent and low-latency performance needed to run your workloads. With Amazon EBS, you can scale your usage up or down within minutes – all while paying a low price for only what you provision.

    Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

    Sample Customers
    Bazaar Voice, Crowd Strike, Adobe, Gamevil, Hess, CopperEgg, TotalJobs Group, SuperCell, Dropcam, Unilever
    1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization47%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Educational Organization8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization63%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Retailer5%
    Comms Service Provider3%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise54%
    Large Enterprise35%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise67%
    Large Enterprise22%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs. Google Cloud Storage
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs. Google Cloud Storage and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is ranked 9th in Cloud Storage with 16 reviews while Google Cloud Storage is ranked 2nd in Cloud Storage with 66 reviews. Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is rated 8.6, while Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) writes "Easy to setup and afforadable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is most compared with Microsoft Azure Block Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier, Oracle Cloud Object Storage and Google Cloud Storage Nearline, whereas Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Microsoft Azure File Storage. See our Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs. Google Cloud Storage report.

    See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.