We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Rancher Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has always helped me. It is the repository where we store our images...The microservices appear to be well-made, and I don't have any comments on them as I don't see any flaws."
"I can use the autoscaling feature to manage and scale up infrastructure."
"The solution has very good basic features."
"It's the best option for medium or large enterprises."
"The product helps us to configure the new environment."
"The tool works well with the nodes in AWS. It's scalability is also good in terms of architecture."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Through Amazon EKS, we can have the blue-green deployment very easily."
"The initial setup is simple and straightforward."
"This solution is not vendor-locked, which means that we we are able to use it across all of our resources; this feature is of great value to us."
"The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or the company, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations."
"The solution has a lot of good features, such as you can access the console and edit through the GUI. The dashboard and the UI are designed well, user-friendly, and easy to manage, and access."
"The most valuable feature of Rancher Labs is its user interface, which makes it easier to work with containers and deployment."
"The product is simple to use for a beginner."
"The most valuable feature is its comprehensive support, easy resource scaling, compatibility with various OEMs, and seamless service integration."
"The solution is stable."
"The management of the nodes in Amazon EKS should be improved."
"The connectivity could be better."
"I'm having difficulty getting my AWS clusters to communicate with my local machine."
"There is room for improvement in stability. I faced some problems with the App."
"Setup depends on what kind of architecture you have"
"The solution should include a popup for clusters so that all relevant information is visible at the bottom of a page."
"I would like Amazon EKS to be easier to configure on various environments like Windows or Linux installations"
"I am not impressed with the tool's Amazon console. It also needs to add security features."
"They should improve application visibility along with code visibility."
"Could be more intuitive."
"The biggest room for improvement in Rancher Labs would be to have a proper upgrading plan."
"We're looking for something that is even easier to use. It's a bit complicated."
"One area for improvement in Rancher Labs is the development aspect."
"If you have poor infrastructure, you will have issues with the tool."
"We'd like their monitoring tool to be integrated by default."
"There needs to be an improvement in observability and microservice monitoring tools in Rancher Labs."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 39 reviews while Rancher Labs is ranked 5th in Container Management with 13 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Rancher Labs is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rancher Labs writes "An easy-to-use user interface, which makes it easy to work with Kubernetes and containers". Amazon EKS is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Linode and HashiCorp Nomad, whereas Rancher Labs is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Docker, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Google Kubernetes Engine. See our Amazon EKS vs. Rancher Labs report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.