We performed a comparison between Amazon Macie and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's performance is good."
"The tool gives confidence that our configuration is safe."
"I'm not an administrator of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, but an end-user, and what I like about it is that it can detect events that could cause data loss. It's a good solution."
"The basic setup, like configuring servers or deploying the SaaS platform and agent implementation, is straightforward."
"The most values feature of this solution are the micro DLP features."
"The interface and dashboard are okay."
"There are no issues with the interface."
"Trend Micro has improved my client's organization by recovering malware disabled network adaptors from servers."
"We find the malware scanning and intrusion detection most valuable for our server management requirements. We can find out who is on our servers and what they have done."
"We are able to check the log and keep records."
"Amazon Macie is expensive."
"The tool should improve its reporting functionality. We need a proper reporting feature in a DLP solution."
"The platform's support structure for government-specific domain requirements could be improved."
"I would like to provide improved network direction in order to regulate all of the user agents. We only use Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention to manage various threats and malicious user agents currently."
"Needs a remote login option."
"Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is buggy, which is one area for improvement. I also found Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention support horrible, so that's another area for improvement."
"Typically, DLP solutions do not cover emails without an additional component, which necessitates a dual-service proposal. Comparatively, on-premises deployments offer more features locally than online or remote deployments, which sometimes face challenges with feature support. This is a common issue with Trend."
"Within the solution, many of the functions do not perform as intended...It is not a stable solution...It is not a scalable solution."
"In Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, there is a need to improve the plug-in manager, as it is an area with shortcomings."
More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon Macie is ranked 19th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 13th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. Amazon Macie is rated 6.6, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of Amazon Macie writes "The solution's performance is good but needs improvement in pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". Amazon Macie is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and Symantec Data Loss Prevention, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian and CoSoSys Endpoint Protector. See our Amazon Macie vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
