We performed a comparison between Amazon MQ and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."
"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."
"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."
"Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"
"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."
"The solution's best feature is its exceptional speed, delivering efficient utilization of resources."
"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."
"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."
"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."
"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."
"VMware RabbitMQ needs to create a new queue system."
"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster."
"Implementing a circuit breaker scenario using RabbitMQ is complicated. This complexity arises because manual intervention is required to manage worker details and handle operations based on worker IP addresses."
"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."
"The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"I was struggling with installing a few things. It would be good if was somewhat similar to RedHat. There should be more documentation regarding installation troubleshooting."
"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."
Amazon MQ is ranked 9th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 3 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 41 reviews. Amazon MQ is rated 8.4, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon MQ writes "Provides you with a URL where you can either send or retrieve messages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Amazon MQ is most compared with Amazon SQS, Apache Kafka, IBM MQ, Red Hat AMQ and EMQX, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ, ActiveMQ and EMQX. See our Amazon MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
