We performed a comparison between Anypoint MQ and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very scalable with solid performance and the capability of extending it using any custom Java in case you don't have anything out of the box. MDP is strong. It is good compared to other products regarding its capabilities in managing or orchestrating the issue load."
"The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components."
"The use of ACK is valuable."
"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."
"We use simple queues and exchanges to route messages to multiple queues. The publish/subscribe model is also helpful."
"It's easy to use and comes as a bundle package with the Anypoint Platform, removing the need for any complex setup."
"Good interface, simple to use and stable."
"Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."
"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."
"The solution can scale."
"The security is great."
"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."
"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."
"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."
"Anypoint MQ could improve the user interface."
"Anypoint MQ's capabilities are mainly used for messaging purposes, but it doesn't have typical use cases that extend as far as other Message Queue software."
"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more."
"The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."
"When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward."
"There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities."
"The product does not provide a priority level for the message."
"Information on monitoring could be improved."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"I’d like this dashboard to use web sockets, so it would actually be in real time. It would slightly increase debugging, etc."
"The solution needs improvement on performance."
"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."
"The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness."
Anypoint MQ is ranked 7th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 10 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 41 reviews. Anypoint MQ is rated 7.0, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Anypoint MQ writes "Useful for asynchronous messaging, but it lacks features, and the storage is limited". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Anypoint MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Amazon SQS, IBM MQ and PubSub+ Event Broker, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, Red Hat AMQ and PubSub+ Event Broker. See our Anypoint MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
