We compared Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Amazon S3 Glacier offers robust features, efficient customer support, varying deployment timelines, cost-effective pricing, and a significant ROI. Users mention slower data retrieval times and interface improvements. In contrast, Google Cloud Storage Nearline emphasizes affordability, scalability, durability, ease of use, and integration capabilities. Users appreciate the helpful customer service, differing deployment timeframes, fair pricing, and positive ROI. They suggest improvements in speed, support, documentation, pricing structure, and integration capabilities.
Features: Amazon S3 Glacier is favored for its long-term storage capability and seamless integration with other AWS services. Google Cloud Storage Nearline is known for its cost-effectiveness, scalability, ease of use, and integration capabilities.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Amazon S3 Glacier is reported to be straightforward and easy to navigate, while the setup cost for Google Cloud Storage Nearline is mentioned to be minimal and hassle-free, facilitating a smooth onboarding process. Additionally, the licensing options for Amazon S3 Glacier are commended for being flexible and accommodating, while the licensing terms for Google Cloud Storage Nearline are described as clear and straightforward., Users have found a highly positive ROI with Amazon S3 Glacier, praising its cost-effectiveness and reliability. Similarly, Google Cloud Storage Nearline also provides significant ROI and benefits.
Room for Improvement: Users have identified areas for improvement in both Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline. For S3 Glacier, faster retrieval time and a more user-friendly interface are desired. In contrast, Google Cloud Storage Nearline needs improvements in speed, documentation, support, pricing, and integration capabilities.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for Amazon S3 Glacier suggest that the duration to establish a new tech solution can vary, with some users taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup, while others only need a week for both. On the other hand, feedback for Google Cloud Storage Nearline indicates varying timeframes, with some users spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup. However, it's important to consider the context in which users use these terms., Customers have reported positive experiences with the customer service and support provided by both Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline. They appreciate the prompt assistance and expertise of the support teams for each platform.
The summary above is based on 31 interviews we conducted recently with Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The solution is secure."
"It is the most feature-rich platform."
"AWS Lambda is the most valuable part of the solution because it gives you a code interface for everything."
"We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign."
"The pricing is low, and it's dedicated to archiving is valuable to us."
"The tool is simple to use and not very expensive."
"I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done in a simpler manner."
"The main advantage of Glacier is its low cost. It is incredibly cheaper than other storage options, especially for objects you don't access frequently. Glacier would add value if you have a staging area for objects you only need to access occasionally. Since we have data in terabytes between S3 buckets, we can significantly reduce our storage and cost footprint by using Glacier."
"The data structure and the types of data that are supported are very good."
"I find the flexibility in storing documents or data and the ease of retrieval valuable with this solution."
"The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline."
"It provides the necessary support and flexibility to manage data storage effectively, especially during times of variable data flow."
"Google is always introducing new features and tends to have a new release every month."
"The capacity and space on offer are excellent."
"It can isolate files and stop them from corrupting other files."
"Nearline is highly stable."
"The solution's cost optimization could be improved."
"A couple of times, we faced outage issues that caused us problems."
"I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3 Glacier's reporting system somewhat confusing compared to other hyperscalers in the market."
"The product’s pricing must be improved."
"The solution's dashboard is a bit complicated and could be improved."
"I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection."
"The solution’s deployment process is complex and could be improved."
"The learning curve is very high."
"The pricing is quite high."
"The UI could be a little bit more effective."
"The solution needs to offer better System Information and Event Management (SEIM). I'd like to discover how we could implement something like that within Google's cloud."
"They should provide more options or flexibility in terms of pricing."
"Nearline security could be better. The solution could integrate better with SEIM tools."
"They need a better, more visual, user interface for folders and files."
"The suggestion for improvement primarily revolves around cost efficiency."
"The interface for managing file storage in the buckets could be improved."
More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews while Google Cloud Storage Nearline is ranked 12th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 8 reviews. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while Google Cloud Storage Nearline is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage Nearline writes "Provides APIs for everything and has good protection through encryption". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), whereas Google Cloud Storage Nearline is most compared with Amazon S3, Wasabi and Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store). See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
