Amazon S3 vs Amazon S3 Glacier comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
8,712 views|5,262 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
5,982 views|5,152 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Amazon S3 Glacier based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 vs. Amazon S3 Glacier Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The multi-zone replication is great.""The tool helps us with data backup storage of payment files and helps us avoid issues with clients when we miss the data. For instance, in the payment file of my Google client, you can find details of one-to-one transactions like the payment information on the file header, payment ID, payment client ID, group headers, etc. We get these details into the file format of ISO which is the accepted format at JP Morgan & Chase. Once we get the file format, we process it through S3.""The most valuable feature of Amazon S3 is the data transfer acceleration because it can enable fast, easy, and secure data transfer.""Amazon S3 is a stable solution.""The most valuable feature is the sharing capabilities.""I've also used Azure's tool, and S3 is far more stable I haven't seen the same issues on AWS that I'm having on Azure. Amazon CloudFront is way faster. The websites are loading way faster than when you do it on Azure CDN.""The stability is very good.""The most valuable features of Amazon S3 are the global availability, resiliency, and ease of access control."

More Amazon S3 Pros →

"We use the solution for migration.""Amazon S3 Glacier is an easy-to-use solution.""AWS does support the ability for user controlled movement of data between regions for business continuance (BC), high availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR).""The pricing is low, and it's dedicated to archiving is valuable to us.""The solution is secure.""Amazon S3 Glacier can integrate seamlessly with other AWS services.""The solution is great for storing data you don't usually need access to. It's also well-integrated with Amazon S3.""AWS Lambda is the most valuable part of the solution because it gives you a code interface for everything."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros →

Cons
"The upload speed for data and documents is sometimes slow.""We need the mapping to Windows. That feature is needed in S3. That feature is in the Azure cloud where we can map it like a drive. We can map the cloud storage to the effort driving our Windows PC. But Amazon is not providing that feature for the S3 solution.""An encryption mechanism and storage optimization could be added.""The tool needs to improve its flexibility in support.""Amazon S3 should have more frequent updates.""I would like a batch downloading option added to the AWS console.""The solution's cost should be improved.""It could maybe use more integration."

More Amazon S3 Cons →

"The technical support has room for improvement.""Amazon S3 Glacier's data retrieval time is slow compared to other AWS storage services and should be improved.""The product is difficult to use.""Technical support needs improvement. Previously, even though we had premium and enterprise support, the response time would be quicker if we ran into issues, but now it is slowed down. The analytical dashboard feature, like the CloudOps dashboard, should be included in the next release of the Amazon S3 Glacier.""The solution's pricing is too expensive and could be improved.""The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data.""A couple of times, we faced outage issues that caused us problems.""The solution’s deployment process is complex and could be improved."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "With S3 Standard, there is not a charge for deletion of objects."
  • "This solution has reasonable pricing and a low cost."
  • "The licensing is pay as you go, and I'm happy with the pricing."
  • "The cost of storage is cheap. However, the cost to have a better interface can get expensive. We are using Athena for this purpose and if we did some heavy queries the cost will start adding up. When the Athena query is running, it will scan the bucket and they charge for how many GBs we are going to scan. The function of scanning has a lot of costs attached to it, this is a negative point."
  • "The price of the Amazon S3 is low. The license model is based on what you use."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 depends on various variables. However, the price overall is fair."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 could be less expensive."
  • "The license of Amazon S3 is based on volume, capacity, and time. The overall price of the solution could improve. The support has to be added if you want it at an additional cost."
  • More Amazon S3 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."
  • "There is no license, you pay for what you use."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "The product is cheap."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."
  • More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon S3 is very flexible and provides high storage.
    Top Answer:The solution is cost-effective because it is based on a pay-as-you-go model, where I can purchase and use it according to my needs.
    Top Answer:No direct connector is available to connect Amazon S3 with other tools like MicroStrategy. So, I have to use a third party and connect to it.
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, which… more »
    Top Answer:I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done in… more »
    Top Answer:I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3 Glacier's reporting system somewhat confusing compared to other hyperscalers in the… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    8,712
    Comparisons
    5,262
    Reviews
    49
    Average Words per Review
    377
    Rating
    8.8
    Views
    5,982
    Comparisons
    5,152
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    360
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    S3, Simple Storage Service
    Amazon Glacier
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

    Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    Sample Customers
    Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
    King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Real Estate/Law Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization68%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company42%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Integrator4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization30%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise72%
    Large Enterprise21%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise44%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon S3 vs. Amazon S3 Glacier
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Amazon S3 Glacier and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon S3 is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 67 reviews while Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Google Cloud Storage and Wasabi, whereas Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Wasabi and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System). See our Amazon S3 vs. Amazon S3 Glacier report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.