Amazon SQS vs Redis comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
6,473 views|5,673 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
RedisLabs Logo
240 views|221 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and Redis based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon SQS vs. Redis Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective.""I am able to find out what's going on very easily.""I appreciate that Amazon SQS is fully integrated with Amazon and can be accessed through normal functions or serverless functions, making it very user-friendly. Additionally, the features are comparable to those of other solutions.""We use SNS as the publisher, and our procurement service subscribes to those events using SQS. In the past, we relied on time-based or batch-based processes to send data between services on-premises. With SQS, we can trigger actions based on real-time changes in business processes, improving reliability.""We use the tool in interface integrations.""One of the useful features is the ability to schedule a call after a certain number of messages accumulate in the container. For example, if there are ten messages in the container, you can perform a specific action.""It is stable and scalable.""The libraries that connect and manage the queues are rich in features."

More Amazon SQS Pros →

"The product offers fast access to my database.""Redis is a simple, powerful, and fast solution.""It makes operations more efficient. The information processing is very fast, and very responsive. It's all about the technology.""The ability to fetch and save data quickly is valuable.""Redis is better tested and is used by large companies. I haven't found a direct alternative to what Redis offers. Plus, there are a lot of support and learning resources available, which help you use Redis efficiently.""The solution's technical support team is good...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward.""The in-memory data makes it fast.""The online interface is very fast and easy to use."

More Redis Pros →

Cons
"Sometimes, we have to switch to another component similar to SQS because the patching tool for SQS is relatively slow for us.""The tool needs improvement in user-friendliness and discoverability.""The solution is not available on-premises so that rules out any customers looking for the messaging solution on-premises.""It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues.""The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules.""The current visibility timeout of five minutes is okay. However, I'd like to explore the possibility of extending it for specific use cases.""Be cautious around pay-as-you-use licensing as costs can become expensive.""Sending or receiving messages takes some time, and it could be quicker."

More Amazon SQS Cons →

"If we use a lot of data, it will eventually cost us a lot.""I would prefer it if there was more information available about Redis. That would make it easier for new beginners. Currently, there is a lack of resources.""Sometimes, we use Redis as a cluster, and the clusters can sometimes suffer some issues and bring some downtime to your application.""The development of clusters could improve. Additionally, it would be helpful if it was integrated with Amazon AWS or Google Cloud.""The initial setup took some time as our technical team needed to familiarize themselves with Redis.""There is a lack of documentation on the scalability of the solution.""It's actually quite expensive.""The only thing is the lack of a GUI application. There was a time when we needed to resolve an issue in production. If we had a GUI, it would have been easier."

More Redis Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Amazon SQS is more affordable compared to other solutions."
  • "The pricing of Amazon SQS is reasonable. The first million requests are free every month, and after, it's cost 40 cents for every million requests. There are not any additional fees."
  • "Amazon SQS is quite expensive and is at the highest price point compared to other solutions."
  • "SQS's pricing is very good - I would rate it nine out of ten."
  • "The pricing model is pay-as-you-use. It depends on your usage and configuration."
  • "Amazon SQS is moderately priced."
  • "It's quite expensive."
  • More Amazon SQS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Redis is an open-source solution. There are not any hidden fees."
  • "Redis is not an overpriced solution."
  • "Redis is an open-source product."
  • "We saw an ROI. It made the processing of our transactions faster."
  • More Redis Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use it for event-driven messaging and workflows.
    Top Answer:Redis is a simple, powerful, and fast solution.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, we use Redis as a cluster, and the clusters can sometimes suffer some issues and bring some downtime to your application.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, Redis is used as a cache and sometimes as the main database.
    Ranking
    Views
    6,473
    Comparisons
    5,673
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    378
    Rating
    8.2
    7th
    Views
    240
    Comparisons
    221
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    312
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Apache Kafka logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Amazon MQ logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Anypoint MQ logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    ActiveMQ logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Google Cloud Memorystore logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    ActiveMQ logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Chroma logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Faiss logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    OpenSearch logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Redis Enterprise
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) is a fully managed message queuing service that enables you to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. SQS eliminates the complexity and overhead associated with managing and operating message oriented middleware, and empowers developers to focus on differentiating work. Using SQS, you can send, store, and receive messages between software components at any volume, without losing messages or requiring other services to be available. Get started with SQS in minutes using the AWS console, Command Line Interface or SDK of your choice, and three simple commands.

    SQS offers two types of message queues. Standard queues offer maximum throughput, best-effort ordering, and at-least-once delivery. SQS FIFO queues are designed to guarantee that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent.

    Redis is a high-performance, scalable, and easy-to-use caching solution that improves application performance. It is also used for session management, real-time analytics, and as a message broker. 

    Redis's valuable features include its ability to handle large amounts of data quickly, its simplicity and straightforward setup process, and its support for various data structures, providing flexibility for different use cases.

    Sample Customers
    EMS, NASA, BMW, Capital One
    1. Twitter 2. GitHub 3. StackOverflow 4. Pinterest 5. Snapchat 6. Craigslist 7. Digg 8. Weibo 9. Airbnb 10. Uber 11. Slack 12. Trello 13. Shopify 14. Coursera 15. Medium 16. Twitch 17. Foursquare 18. Meetup 19. Kickstarter 20. Docker 21. Heroku 22. Bitbucket 23. Groupon 24. Flipboard 25. SoundCloud 26. BuzzFeed 27. Disqus 28. The New York Times 29. Walmart 30. Nike 31. Sony 32. Philips
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Manufacturing Company29%
    University14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Educational Organization8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon SQS vs. Redis
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon SQS vs. Redis and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon SQS is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 13 reviews while Redis is ranked 7th in Database as a Service with 9 reviews. Amazon SQS is rated 8.2, while Redis is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Stable, useful interface, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Redis writes "Enables efficient caching and helps users fetch and save data quickly". Amazon SQS is most compared with Apache Kafka, Amazon MQ, Anypoint MQ, Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service and ActiveMQ, whereas Redis is most compared with Google Cloud Memorystore, ActiveMQ, Chroma, Faiss and OpenSearch. See our Amazon SQS vs. Redis report.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.