We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and Anypoint MQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One of the useful features is the ability to schedule a call after a certain number of messages accumulate in the container. For example, if there are ten messages in the container, you can perform a specific action."
"I am able to find out what's going on very easily."
"The libraries that connect and manage the queues are rich in features."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon SQS is the interface."
"It is stable and scalable."
"I appreciate that Amazon SQS is fully integrated with Amazon and can be accessed through normal functions or serverless functions, making it very user-friendly. Additionally, the features are comparable to those of other solutions."
"We use SNS as the publisher, and our procurement service subscribes to those events using SQS. In the past, we relied on time-based or batch-based processes to send data between services on-premises. With SQS, we can trigger actions based on real-time changes in business processes, improving reliability."
"It's very quick and easy to build or set up Amazon SQS."
"Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types."
"Initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment is a cakewalk."
"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."
"The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components."
"The use of ACK is valuable."
"The solution is very scalable with solid performance and the capability of extending it using any custom Java in case you don't have anything out of the box. MDP is strong. It is good compared to other products regarding its capabilities in managing or orchestrating the issue load."
"We use simple queues and exchanges to route messages to multiple queues. The publish/subscribe model is also helpful."
"Good interface, simple to use and stable."
"I cannot send a message to multiple people simultaneously. It can only be sent to one recipient."
"Sometimes, we have to switch to another component similar to SQS because the patching tool for SQS is relatively slow for us."
"Sending or receiving messages takes some time, and it could be quicker."
"The solution is not available on-premises so that rules out any customers looking for the messaging solution on-premises."
"It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues."
"Support could be improved."
"The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules."
"The tool needs improvement in user-friendliness and discoverability."
"The product does not provide a priority level for the message."
"The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."
"There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities."
"It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved."
"Anypoint MQ could improve the user interface."
"When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward."
"Information on monitoring could be improved."
"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more."
Amazon SQS is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 13 reviews while Anypoint MQ is ranked 7th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 10 reviews. Amazon SQS is rated 8.2, while Anypoint MQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Stable, useful interface, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Anypoint MQ writes "Useful for asynchronous messaging, but it lacks features, and the storage is limited". Amazon SQS is most compared with Apache Kafka, Redis, Amazon MQ, Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service and IBM MQ, whereas Anypoint MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and PubSub+ Event Broker. See our Amazon SQS vs. Anypoint MQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
