We performed a comparison between Apple Xcode and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is complete and relevant to the job at hand."
"The tool's most valuable features are debugging and code management."
"The most valuable feature of Apple Xcode is that it is up to date."
"It is stable and user-friendly."
"We like the ease of access and navigation that this solution provides."
"Xcode has quite a bit of code error checking built-in, which is great. It also goes a step further and suggests fixes."
"Xcode is pretty smart. It's easy to set up and works perfectly on Android."
"I like the mobile features the most, and there are also various features around the portal we created that I enjoy."
"The scalability of OutSystems is very good, it scales automatically very useful for us."
"OutSystems is easy to use."
"The scratch coding is useful. The solution is easy to understand."
"The drag-and-drop feature is very valuable."
"The most valuable feature of OutSystems is the drag and drop and toolchains in the small AI developing environment. Additionally, the documentation is helpful."
"The architecture of OutSystems is quite simple, and the features are similar to Mendix's. OutSystems has connectors for different enterprise apps and solid reporting capabilities. You can also integrate with any content management platform like SharePoint or Adobe Enterprise Manager, or something like that. You can also create and integrate workflows."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."
"As Apple has introduced more and more features on top of Xcode, it sometimes, but very rarely, hangs."
"The size of Apple Xcode could improve. It is too large."
"There should be additional documentation on App Store deployment. In terms of features, they're pretty much on top of where they need to go. I've been happy with its progress so far. As things evolve, they need to evolve to match that need."
"It consists of multiple components and needs a simplified process. This particular area could be more stable."
"It is a bit challenging to sign in."
"There is a drag-and-drop visual system, but as soon as you do something dynamic, then you are unable to use it."
"We would like a 'light' version of this solution to be developed, as it currently uses a lot of memory space."
"OutSystems could improve by being more like GitHub. It would be more helpful for us for division management and version control for our application."
"The product's high price is an area of concern, where improvements are required."
"The latest version of the app generation tools could be more user-friendly."
"The new version could be improved."
"I have difficulty in using several new features. Some of the product's features are tricky to use as well."
"The documentation needs to be more robust."
"The initial setup is a little difficult."
"When shared extensions are updated, all the applications are redeployed."
Apple Xcode is ranked 10th in Mobile Development Platforms with 7 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 1st in Mobile Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Apple Xcode is rated 7.6, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apple Xcode writes "Efficient, up-to-date, and straightforward installation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Useful natural speech to algorithm, reliable, and beneficial automatic task". Apple Xcode is most compared with Xamarin Platform, Appium, Microsoft Azure App Service and ServiceNow, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Apple Xcode vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.