We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and BIC Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The matrix model makes building relations easier."
"you want to do modeling with the old notation form, ours was EPC, you can use the same object in the BPMN because the database is built in a way that you can use both things. So you only have to define it once, and if the notation form is BPMN and those kind of activities, you can use the same EPCs, so there is a connection between them."
"Business Process Analysis: We can simulate, optimize, and analyse business processes based on various business requirements. It assures our rolling out the best processes."
"The BPMN notation and the share flow through users. It is nice to see all flows in a common, shared space for all the stakeholders to view the same thing and the same language."
"The solution provides integrations to ServiceNow and other systems, flexibility of connectivity, and reporting."
"ARIS provides the basic foundation for any digital transformation an organization decides to take."
"The ability to sort via multiple criteria to identify the relationships you need for a specific object."
"Process Modeling or Process Mapping/Documentation. This is the most comprehensive tool for capturing the process details. Any organization who wants to embark on a BPM journey, process mapping/documentation, lays the foundation for the BPM led implementation."
"While this is a new product it has a mature feel from being built by a company with many years in the business."
"The central dictionary is a valuable feature."
"The product is easy to use."
"This is low-cost and very user friendly. A variety of models are available depending on the needs of the customer."
"The solution's processes are huge and it is not easy to get an overview of how things work. It needs to improve the interface. I would like to see the product include a better overview of processes and improve search."
"ARIS BPA’s usability could be improved."
"Since ARIS 9.X was released, the product has not been as robust and responsive as the previous versions."
"The reporting and the information query features could do with some improvement."
"I had a hard time with ARIS's access and licensing policy. It requires you to pay for each step you want to take forward with the solution."
"Displaying role allocation matrix models in ARIS Connect needs improvement."
"The tool's installation and configuration part needs to improve."
"Create simple data uploader."
"The product needs improvement regarding the confidentiality of the domain information for the key administrator."
"As the product is very new, some minor features are still missing, but everything is there to handle day-to-day process modeling."
"There's an issue with the current manual that they're working on."
"The solution could improve its connectivity to other systems."
ARIS BPA is ranked 4th in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while BIC Platform is ranked 18th in Business Process Design with 4 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while BIC Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BIC Platform writes "Provides good stability, but they should add a feature for enterprise architecture". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Appian, whereas BIC Platform is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, Visio, Camunda, ADONIS and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. See our ARIS BPA vs. BIC Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
