We performed a comparison between BIC Platform and Visio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The central dictionary is a valuable feature."
"While this is a new product it has a mature feel from being built by a company with many years in the business."
"This is low-cost and very user friendly. A variety of models are available depending on the needs of the customer."
"The product is easy to use."
"The most valuable aspect of Visio is enabling comprehensive coverage of architectural elements."
"Visio is stable."
"It's very agile and user friendly with a lot of templates."
"The most valuable feature of this product is its versatility."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"I like all the features. I go online, and everything pops there. It is in the cloud, and everything is there. Even if there is a crash, everything is still there. I don't lose anything. That's what is the most valuable and likable. It is really a professional solution for designing. The designs look really nice in the PDF."
"The product's initial setup is really simple."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to draw models quickly."
"There's an issue with the current manual that they're working on."
"As the product is very new, some minor features are still missing, but everything is there to handle day-to-day process modeling."
"The product needs improvement regarding the confidentiality of the domain information for the key administrator."
"The solution could improve its connectivity to other systems."
"It is a visualization tool, so database visualization is pretty static in it. They haven't moved the ERDs very well. They haven't adopted any real visualization like what you have in Hackolade for JSON or other data patterns. It has none of that. If you go onto broader patterns, you can actually label and integrate with a data set, if you want, for Visio, but it's very clunky and very difficult for me to assign that to another user. I can't assign it to a junior or a documenter. They really haven't cleaned up and made their tools simpler to use when linking to data, which is primarily what you're trying to do."
"The solution's flexibility can be perceived as both a strength and a weakness."
"Lacks the ability to analyze the different relations between activities, positions and roles."
"Microsoft should include Visio as part of their Office 365 offering."
"One thing that I always felt was missing was the ability to integrate with other Microsoft products, particularly with things like SharePoint or other Excel Office tools. It may be available, but it is not as good as it could be."
"The application could be lighter or it could be faster with documents."
"There should be more items available from a variety of other products that can be integrated."
"Its support team could be well-equipped with the required information."
BIC Platform is ranked 18th in Business Process Design with 4 reviews while Visio is ranked 1st in Business Process Design with 101 reviews. BIC Platform is rated 8.2, while Visio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BIC Platform writes "Provides good stability, but they should add a feature for enterprise architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visio writes "A software for drawing a variety of diagrams which include flowcharts, org charts, building plans, floor plans, data flow diagrams". BIC Platform is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ARIS BPA, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Camunda, whereas Visio is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Bizagi, Visual Paradigm, IBM Blueworks Live and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our BIC Platform vs. Visio report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
