We performed a comparison between Arista Campus LAN Switches and HPE ProCurve based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in LAN Switching."QoS is the most valuable feature because our clients work with VOIP and Critical applications."
"The feature sets are pretty cool. They've got almost everything that the competition offers."
"The CloudVision Portal allows us to centrally manage all of our Arista products."
"HPE ProCurve is used to connect servers and storage in the data center."
"ProCurve is easy to configure and to know how to create each connection and configuration."
"The solution is fast and inexpensive."
"HPE ProCurve offers a very good value proposition compared to that of other switches and is very energy-efficient."
"The web page interface is very convenient and easy to use for setting up your feedback loops."
"It's easy to manage and configure. The configurations can be exported and imported to another solution."
"HPE ProCurve's most valuable feature is that it is user-friendly."
"The product is robust."
"It would be ideal if the solution was less expensive."
"One of the issues that we have been faced with here in Brazil is that we don't have any list times for delivery."
"I would like to see a version available with eight or sixteen ports."
"There is one proprietary function they lack, and I can't remember what it was called, but it monitors the ports, and then every 10 seconds if the port is down, it can divert the traffic somewhere else."
"The solution should offer different gigabit interfaces. Right now, they have ten gigabits. However, for our needs, we only need one gigabit. We don't need 24 or 48 ports. We only need eight to ten. HPE should introduce into their portfolio some smaller and more compact options."
"The only things that might need improvement would be the administrative tools and the graphical interface. The GUI could be improved on the administrative interface, for example."
"The product could be cheaper."
"The product must provide something similar to Cisco’s command-line interface."
"HPE ProCurve could improve by making their command more similar to other solutions, such as the access codes. There should be a standard. Additionally, if the configurations could be done from the cloud would be a benefit and the port uplink speed should improve."
"The solution's pricing could be made cheaper."
"HPE ProCurve is very complex for junior engineers and beginners. You need a lot of experience in managing switches in order to use this switch."
Earn 20 points
Arista Campus LAN Switches is ranked 13th in LAN Switching while HPE ProCurve is ranked 2nd in LAN Switching with 36 reviews. Arista Campus LAN Switches is rated 8.8, while HPE ProCurve is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Arista Campus LAN Switches writes "Stable, has a lot of uplink interfaces, and several can be centralized managed through a single portal". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE ProCurve writes "Offers reliability and helps with vulnerability assessment". Arista Campus LAN Switches is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches and Cisco FabricPath, whereas HPE ProCurve is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Aruba Instant On Switches, NETGEAR Switches, Dell PowerConnect Switches and Cisco Nexus.
See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.