We performed a comparison between Armis and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"I like Tenable.sc's analytics and reporting. You can also configure your on-prem network monitors to talk to your Tenable.sc control panel."
"I find Tenable SC to be a very scalable product."
"The most important features are the dashboard and reporting. The dashboard provides statistics with graphs and bar charts for our management."
"The initial setup process is simple."
"The usability is really good. It's very easy to use and a good platform. It is scalable and very stable. The technical support is fine and the setup is super easy."
"We really love the Security Center dashboard. It basically performs vulnerability scanning and then outputs a vulnerability data."
"This solution has a much lower rate of false positives compared to competing products."
"Their overall cost of service is pretty good."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"The user interface can be improved."
"In terms of configuration, there is some level of flexibility that we are not able to achieve."
"Tenable has some problems with agents going offline during scanning and lag between agents and the security center."
"If I want to have a very low-managed scan policy, it's a lot of work to create something which is very basic. If I use a tool like Nmap, all I have to do is download it, install it, type in the command, and it's good to go. In Security Center, I have to go through a lot of work to create a policy that's very basic."
"The solution needs to improve the vulnerability assessment because we have experienced some challenges with accuracy."
"The vulnerability scan does not work correctly until the access privileges are set by the system administrator."
"The solution should include compliance-based scanning."
"Tenable SC could be improved with additional connectivity to external company postures and the capability of managing and sustaining agents in the systems directly without additional platforms in the middle."
Armis is ranked 13th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Armis is rated 8.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Armis writes "A straightforward and user-friendly solution that can be used for asset intelligence". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Forescout Platform, Axonius, Claroty Platform and CyberX, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
