We performed a comparison between Aruba Virtual Intranet Access and Check Point Remote Access VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution is very user friendly."
"The most important feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is the multiple factor authentication."
"Among its most valuable features is how it quickly and easily connects everyone to the VPN service."
"The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware. This was a big advantage."
"It offers a simple configuration and setup."
"It can improve an organization by providing secure access to resources for traveling employees, which can help to reduce the risk of data breaches or other security incidents."
"The clients of the customers have a facility to access the enterprise network."
"Setup using the manuals was easy."
"The solution has been solid for me for over five years."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Configurations can be a bit complex."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN handles up to a hundred megabytes for clients, but I want it to be able to handle up to one gigabyte."
"They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage."
"We would like to see support for a layer seven VPN over UDP."
"The ability to allow split-tunneling while still following our corporate policy needs to be on the table."
"Sometimes we have some small problems with Check Point Remote Access VPN. For example, problems with authentication."
"The fully-featured security module is only supported on Windows and Mac systems, which means that organizations with Linux will face issues providing secure access."
"When you need to create something, you have to follow many steps and I think that should be simplified."
"For Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. For the users that utilize Linux, there needs to be an equivalent."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 60 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 7.0, while Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Aruba Virtual Intranet Access writes "Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.