We performed a comparison between Aruba Virtual Intranet Access and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The solution is very user friendly."
"All of our offices are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The solution is scalable."
"It is easy to configure."
"The most valuable feature is the networking. I didn't have a good experience with the networking that Sophos has."
"It sends us a lot of detections when we have any anti-virus updates. It provides the extended time needed to update a set of time needs and notifications."
"It is a stable solution in our company, and we monitor critical health and performance parameters daily and weekly."
"The point-to-site is pretty good for the B2C stuff. It's fairly straightforward to set up."
"The interoperability with various firewall and access gateway vendors is one of this solution's most valuable features"
"The Azure tool is useful and powerful and availability for clients. The updates are very good and reliable."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Configurations can be a bit complex."
"The product must provide a single sign-on."
"Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway could improve by providing IPS zero-day threat protection. For example, the IPS zero-day threat protection can monitor the user behavior to protect the infrastructure. The solution can only be used as a VPN, it is lacking features."
"Make it completely routable, for example, if I have a gateway, I should be able to connect to whatever network I want on either side of the gateway, and the gateway should figure out which packet goes where."
"Documentation and configuration settings can be improved."
"In future releases, I would like to see the ability to inject BGP routes."
"I would like for them to improve the troubleshooting features. We have some problems with traffic and I can't identify where the problem is coming from. I have to open a ticket with support until it gets resolved. Microsoft doesn't offer enough tools to resolve the issue."
"Microsoft could work on having micro VPNs to integrate with mobile devices."
"The solution must provide metrics to monitor the inbound and outbound traffic easily."
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is ranked 4th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 19 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 7.0, while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Virtual Intranet Access writes "Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway writes "A scalable and reliable solution that enables users to connect to older protocols that other products do not have". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, whereas Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and AWS PrivateLink.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.