We performed a comparison between Aruba Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless LAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The solution is very secure."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The solution is stable."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The simplicity is great."
"What I like best about Aruba Wireless is that it doesn't need a controller. The product also has a GUI that's easy to navigate."
"It has improved overall IT efficiency across the board."
"The solution is quite stable and very robust."
"The Airwave is the best feature for a single management point for all APs in the environment."
"I have found the Access Point (AP) group profile feature extremely useful. It makes deployments look easy."
"The product has been pretty stable...The product is scalable."
"With the central management system, I'm able to access each device. I can configure one device and then it provisions all the other devices with the same configuration, rather than my having to configure them one by one."
"I have not experienced any bugs, software, or hardware issues with Aruba."
"The after-sales services are helpful."
"The product has valuable throughput capabilities. It also has an inbuilt spectrum analyzer for stable connectivity."
"They all have controllers built in, and we manage them all with a web-based management tool."
"It is a stable and secure platform."
"What I like best about Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is that it's easy to configure, has no licensing hassle, and is a controller-based solution."
"This solution is extremely user-friendly; it is very easy to configure and work with."
"The product is user-friendly and helps with cost minimization."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its range and stability."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The solution is expensive."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"Access point mounting options could be better."
"The stability and management could be improved."
"There is a long queue whenever we reach out to support, and we have to wait for them to answer calls. Once we get in touch with them, we have to coordinate with different teams, so our engineers struggle to understand who are the correct team members. I think support is another area where Aruba needs to improve."
"The dashboards that represent the network access control in Aruba Wireless could improve."
"The management system would be better if it were more polished, if it had a better interface like, for example, Meraki"
"The urgent areas of improvement would be customer support, better tuned default settings, and documentation."
"The solution is now taking eight to 12 months to deliver the product."
"I would have liked to see more manufacturer driven events and outings to drive brand recognition and familiarity."
"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN should improve its pricing."
"I believe there's room for improvement in the configuration options for point-to-point setups directly from the cloud management interface. Currently, the process feels a bit clunky—you monitor the unit in the cloud but need to make configuration changes by editing a text file, then downloading it back to the unit. This method can be error-prone, as even a small mistake in the text file could disrupt the unit's configuration."
"The solution’s technical support could be faster."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."
"The product pricing needs improvement."
"We would like this product to have more information data sheets available. At present we cannot easily access details around the full capability of a piece of equipment."
"The solution should be scalable, offering better pricing options as we optimize the network for coverage, capacity, and quality"
"The platform's cost needs improvement."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless LAN with 138 reviews while Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is ranked 14th in Wireless LAN with 14 reviews. Aruba Wireless is rated 8.4, while Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Wireless writes "The portal for centralized management and virtual controller for APs are very valuable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN writes "Easy to configure; one of the cheapest solutions in the market". Aruba Wireless is most compared with Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and Huawei Wireless, whereas Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Instant On Access Points, Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Instant and ExtremeWireless. See our Aruba Wireless vs. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
