We performed a comparison between Atos DirX Directory and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."DirX Directory is the best feature of the product: a very fast, stable LDAP directory."
"The most valuable feature is its knowledge."
"The role and attribute-based access control has been greatly improved."
"The solution offers high performance."
"The initial setup of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is easy."
"This is a scalable product."
"The product is stable and reliable."
"We use this product for SSL two-factor authentication and FortiToken management."
"The product is good, cost-effective, and functionally efficient."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy. It is also easy to deploy."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it easy to install. The user experience is very good."
"I prefer the passing tool that sent an active directory console to a Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, then Fortinet FortiAuthenticator does not pass the locks."
"The user interface could be more convenient for people that don't know the tool too intensively."
"The Self-Service Portal is old school and it lacks easy accessibility for users."
"Needs more available consultants and implementation partners."
"An overall modernization of the product is required in order to keep up with newer products."
"The price could be better. It would be better if they developed a better endpoint solution in the next release."
"The GUI is on the older side but I'm sure that it will be upgraded soon. It works, but it looks a little dated."
"There is a room for improvement. The log is a bit difficult to access, and searching the log codes is also a bit difficult. So it would be much better if, when we open a log, it could provide detailed information about errors, reasons for failure, and such."
"Integration with FortiGate could be more fluid."
"There is room for improvement in stability and support."
"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive."
"There are some protocols, such as SHA and SHA-2, that are not supported."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator's initial setup process could be easier."
"It can not use SQL to query FortiAnalyzer directly."
Atos DirX Directory is ranked 19th in Application Infrastructure with 4 reviews while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews. Atos DirX Directory is rated 6.8, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Atos DirX Directory writes "An identity management system with valuable knowledge". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". Atos DirX Directory is most compared with One Identity Manager, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.