We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and IBM MQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, TIBCO, Aurea and others in Business Activity Monitoring."The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"It is stable, reliable, and scalable."
"It's ability to scale, it's ability to do guaranteed delivery and it's ability to do point-to-point of what we subscribe are the most valuable features."
"Secure, safe, and very fast."
"The clusterization which results in persistence is the most valuable feature."
"I like the architecture it provides seamlessly for assured delivery."
"Reliable integration between MQ servers is the most valuable feature."
"The solution is very stable."
"Encryption and the fact that we have not had any data loss issues so far have been very valuable features. IBM MQ is well encrypted so that we are well within our compliance and regulatory requirements, so that is a plus point as well."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"I would like to see faster monitoring tools for this solution."
"It would be great if the dashboard had additional features like a board design."
"We need to have a better administration console and better monitoring features. Right now, they are not good and could be a lot better."
"I would like to see message duplication included."
"IBM HQ's scalability isn't the best."
"Scaling is difficult with IBM MQ."
"I believe the stability of the product has decreased since we began using it initially."
"There are many complications with IBM MQ servers."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 3rd in Business Activity Monitoring with 7 reviews while IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Business Activity Monitoring with 158 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while IBM MQ is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "Offers the ability to batch metadata transfers between systems that support MQ as the communication method". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas IBM MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, VMware RabbitMQ, Red Hat AMQ and Amazon SQS.
See our list of best Business Activity Monitoring vendors, best Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) vendors, and best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Business Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.