We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"I'm not using ESB directly. It is the integration layer, so it's running under the hood. However, the conversion and transformation performance is excellent. Anypoint Enterprise Security is also solid."
"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."
"The solution has a good graphical interface."
"The transformation and the data format are the features that I like the most."
"The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot."
"The most valuable feature is that it's programmer-friendly, so it's very easy to develop APIs."
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"The solution offers multiple deployment options."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"Lacking some connectors that could be included."
"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that."
"It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed."
"I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution."
"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."
"The price of Mule ESB could improve."
"There are some features on the commercial version of the solution that would be great if they were on the community version. Additionally, if they added more authorization features it would be helpful."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 12th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 7 reviews while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, Red Hat Fuse and webMethods Integration Server.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.