We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution doesn't require much code writing and we can develop APIs very easily."
"The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot."
"The architecture based on events has several connectors which allow integration from external and internal applications of the company."
"I am impressed with the product's connectors and scalability."
"The product offers a community edition that is free of cost."
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"I like that it's user-friendly. Compared to other ESBs, I find it easier to use. I like it better than other ESBs. I like the connectors, which make calling the APIs through the routers easier."
"The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"It was very good at supporting high transactions, up to 300 transactions per second."
"It is stable."
"This product is not complicated and very easy to learn."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"With Oracle Service Bus, we can connect with different types of systems. Another feature I like the most is the security feature."
"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"We would like the ability to use our own code. This would allow us to develop customizations with ease. Additionally, it would be nice to have more analytics or insights on the exchanged information between databases."
"The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster."
"From the product perspective, it was sometimes hard to manage the dependencies. When we had to add dependencies on a couple of different packages, it was sometimes confusing. It was hard to update them with Anypoint Studio, as well as with MuleSoft. There were challenges with that. So, that's one of the areas that could be improved."
"It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvement in the generator for the DataWeave language so that it's a little more graphic."
"MuleSoft is not so strong in method-based integration, so they're not so functional in that regard."
"There are some issues with both stability and scalability."
"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"Lacks sufficient cloud compatibility."
"Security features can be improved to better protect the server."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
"There are some loopholes in service and support."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations."
Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. Mule ESB is rated 8.0, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, Red Hat Fuse, webMethods Integration Server and IBM DataPower Gateway, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus. See our Mule ESB vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
