We performed a comparison between AWS CodeCommit and GitHub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."
"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."
"It has a lot of features from the code development perspective. You get a lot of features such as repo, commit, merge, and branch. You can play around and do things on the fly. It is easy and simple to deploy. It is also easier to use when working from home."
"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."
"GitHub have a built-in software application development environment and this has been most useful."
"The solution is scalable."
"The deployment is fast since we just have to run the script, and once it's done, it takes a few minutes."
"GitHub is pure or open-source; you can access it anywhere. You can have a lot of collateral information. You can make the changes and do the reviews from one place."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it can support you for most of the road map and it can automate some tasks which works really well with collaboration with the teams. They are really interested in how they organize the history of the code itself which is good."
"This product allows us to easily collaborate on development tasks with our subcontractors, and control the workflow as the project progresses."
"The tool should improve its UI."
"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."
"The product must document the CI/CD process more."
"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."
"Github needs more storage."
"It would be better if the amount of storage were increased."
"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."
"I think it would be valuable to have more security. Some of the data is very open to everyone."
"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."
"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."
AWS CodeCommit is ranked 5th in Version Control with 2 reviews while GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 64 reviews. AWS CodeCommit is rated 7.6, while GitHub is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS CodeCommit writes "Offers convenient and cost-effective version control but lacks some advanced features and integration options ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". AWS CodeCommit is most compared with Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket Server, whereas GitHub is most compared with Snyk, Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree, Fortify on Demand and Checkmarx One. See our AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
