AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,151 views|1,994 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Atlassian Logo
5,681 views|5,228 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS CodeCommit and Bitbucket Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username.""AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

More AWS CodeCommit Pros →

"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products.""It is an amazingly stable solution.""The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines.""Bitbucket Server supports code collaboration by providing commands developers can use to check in code. Through comments, developers can specify the purpose of the code check-in. Additionally, Bitbucket allows tagging of code for releases.""In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud.""Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian.""The tool makes pushing codes and setting up CI/CD pipelines easy.""The product is easy to maintain."

More Bitbucket Server Pros →

Cons
"The tool should improve its UI.""There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

More AWS CodeCommit Cons →

"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time.""If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch.""Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development.""Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive.""The product's initial setup phase is complex.""It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines.""Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available.""At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."

More Bitbucket Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."
  • More AWS CodeCommit Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."
  • "The solution comes as a part of the suite."
  • "We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."
  • "We pay around $6 per user."
  • "Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."
  • "The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."
  • "One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."
  • More Bitbucket Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.
    Top Answer:As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only… more »
    Top Answer:need some simple way to Cross-account access of Repository and CICD pipeline .
    Top Answer:I don't see any complexity involved in the product, especially since some of its users are DevOps engineers. My company works less in the area of storing source codes using the product. My company… more »
    Top Answer:I use the solution in my company to store source code and for version control.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    2,151
    Comparisons
    1,994
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.5
    2nd
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    5,681
    Comparisons
    5,228
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    416
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CodeCommit
    Stash
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

    Stash has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs.

    Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure.

    For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale.

    Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers.

    Sample Customers
    Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob
    Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS CodeCommit is ranked 5th in Version Control with 2 reviews while Bitbucket Server is ranked 2nd in Version Control with 20 reviews. AWS CodeCommit is rated 7.6, while Bitbucket Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS CodeCommit writes "Offers convenient and cost-effective version control but lacks some advanced features and integration options ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket Server writes "An easy to use solution that works as a code repository for developers and helps them merge changes ". AWS CodeCommit is most compared with Bitbucket, GitHub and Atlassian SourceTree, whereas Bitbucket Server is most compared with Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree and GitHub. See our AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server report.

    See our list of best Version Control vendors.

    We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.