We performed a comparison between AWS IAM Identity Center and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The product is easy for beginners to learn and use."
"The solution is very easy to manage."
"Valuable features include the robust SSO features, when you have more complicated authentication within an organization. We can mix AD, Radius, Portal, SSO Portals (Google, etc.), and build our own environment. It is very flexible."
"The initial setup is a valuable point on Fortinet products. Most of the time, putting the theory into practice on the devices is quite friendly and straightforward. As long as you can read English you can find your way around the solution and make it work. This is a high value point on Fortinet - the way everything is laid out in the web UI is user-friendly and quite straightforward. The UI is quite simple."
"Enables easy integration, allowing for 2FA with our VPN."
"The feature I value the most is the one-time passwords because it helps to authenticate users so you know the timing of their usage."
"The first valuable feature is being able to see everything on one platform. This includes logs and authentication failure."
"It integrates very tightly with the rest of the Fortinet ecosystem."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration with FortiGate, FortiToken, FortiTalk, and multi-factor authentication."
"In the product, two groups cannot have the same name...In general, the tool does not allow for the duplication of names."
"For improvement, Fortinet needs to ensure that they provide quick support to users...Fortinet sometimes needs to respond to users facing issues within an hour."
"We've had some issues with integration."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"We would like to see Linux-based operating systems be able to integrate with FortiAuthenticator to get two-factor authentication running on them. as well. This is a shortcoming that I have faced a few times already."
"Integration with some other enterprise applications could be improved."
"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive."
"The integration with third-party tools must be better."
"The only issue I encounter is that when not using FortiAuthenticator for an extended period, it's typical to encounter some obstacles in the configuration process that you need to address."
AWS IAM Identity Center is ranked 13th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 1 review while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews. AWS IAM Identity Center is rated 9.0, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS IAM Identity Center writes "Helps users provide or revoke accesses whenever needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". AWS IAM Identity Center is most compared with Red Hat Single Sign On, Microsoft Entra ID and PingFederate, whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Cisco Duo and Microsoft Entra ID.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.