We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The web solution effectively protects from vulnerabilities and cyber attacks."
"AWS WAF has a lot of integrated features and services. For example, there are security services that can be integrated very well for our customers."
"This is not a product that you need to install. You just use it."
"We can host any DB or application on the solution."
"The customizable features are good."
"The ability to take multiple data sets and match those data sets together is the solution's most valuable feature. The data lake that comes with it is very useful because that allows us to match data sets with different configurations that we wouldn't normally be able to match."
"The most valuable features are the geo-restriction denials and the web ACL."
"The security firewall plus the features that protect against database injections or scripting,"
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"It's a bit difficult to apply the right rules for the right security."
"When users choose the free service, there isn't great support available to them."
"In a future release of this solution, I would like to see additional management features to make things simpler."
"The product must provide more features."
"I believe there is a need to move towards real-time analysis with the help of AI and intelligent systems in the future. This would reduce the reliance on manual work and enhance the functionality of detection protection. By incorporating AI-driven data analysis and data science techniques, we can improve the solution's user-friendliness, security compatibility, and accuracy."
"One area for improvement in AWS WAF could be the limitation on the number of rules, particularly those from third-party sources, within the free tier."
"Technical support for AWS WAF needs improvement."
"The solution could be more reliable."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and Radware DefensePro.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.