We performed a comparison between F5 Advanced WAF and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The anti-bot protection is the solution's most valuable feature. Safe-guard or credential staffing are also useful features."
"F5 Advanced WAF helps our engineers to learn the complete configuration, including fundamental and advanced policies."
"The most valuable feature is artificial intelligence and to get extra internal access."
"iRules are quite appealing when it comes to F5."
"The solution isn't too expensive. The license allows you to license what you need and leave out what you don't need."
"It also has antivirus and DDoS mitigation capabilities. We have enabled these features."
"The most valuable features of the F5 Advanced WAF are the enhanced ASM and the performance. Additionally, the usability and effectiveness are very good."
"The most valuable feature of F5 Advanced WAF is its grand unity of the implementation, where you have the freedom to configure based on how it affects your use case or your organization. With the default setting of implicit deny, you can gradually start defining and deploying the tool to align with your environment, whether it is outdated, recent, or futuristic. This allows you to customize the solution to protect you from threat actors. You have the ability to define what the advanced threat act should do - whether it should alert, deny, or both - and it will deliver based on your configuration. Unlike other online solutions, F5 Advanced WAF provides flexibility to deliver to your unique environment the way you want."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"One thing that can be improved, is to increase the quantity over predefine policy."
"The overall price of F5 Advanced WAF could improve."
"The deployment side is quite complex."
"Scalability could be improved."
"The Sandbox integration feature could be improved."
"F5 Advanced WAF needs better integration within the application, like remote dashboards."
"I would like to see a better interface and better documentation compatibility with other products. It's more complicated with OWASP."
"The accuracy of the automatic learning feature needs improvement."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
F5 Advanced WAF is ranked 2nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 55 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. F5 Advanced WAF is rated 8.6, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of F5 Advanced WAF writes "Flexible configuration, reliable, and highly professional support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". F5 Advanced WAF is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, AWS WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Radware DefensePro, AWS WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
