We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Radware Alteon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the capability to limit access based on geographical location by restricting specific IP addresses."
"The most valuable features of AWS WAF are its cloud-native and on-demand."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability because it automatically scales up or scales down as per our requirements."
"The interface is good."
"What I like best about AWS WAF is that it's a simple tool, so I could understand the basics of AWS WAF in two to three hours."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment took about ten minutes or less."
"The ease of deployment of the product is valuable to me."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to integrate central sets. It protects from intrusion attacks such as scripting and SQL injections."
"It is easy to expand. Our clients are enterprise-size."
"his solution allows me to secure applications, by blocking suspicious traffic based on the signature that has been enabled for that particular application."
"I like the ADC feature and the global certificate feature."
"I like the web GUI. It's very intuitive and easy to use."
"A user-friendly and reasonably priced solution."
"Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure."
"The best part is that we are able to manage it easily. It is easy to manage and easy to integrate with third-party applications."
"The strength of this solution is the application delivery controller."
"In a future release of this solution, I would like to see additional management features to make things simpler."
"It would be good if the solution provided managed WAF services."
"It will be helpful if the product recommends rules that we can implement."
"The setup is complicated."
"AWS WAF should provide better protection to its users, and the security features need to improve."
"We must monitor and clean up the WAF manually."
"We should be able to do proper whitelisting."
"We need more support as we go global."
"The user interface can be improved."
"I would like for the load balancing to work with premier and the cloud, a mix of premium and cloud."
"Load balancing needs improvement. It needs better integration. I heard f5 works as a DNS operator which is not available in this solution. It would be better if that was implemented."
"Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers."
"Support is an area that needs improvement."
"We don't integrate anything with it because most things don't integrate with Radware. If it were F5, we could integrate it. We can integrate F5 with practically anything that integrates with a load balancer, but that's not the case with Alteon."
"We are having a difficult time with the security module, and how to implement the Radware security."
"You need to have pretty good internal knowledge of the solution."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Radware Alteon is ranked 10th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 33 reviews. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "It's a good fit for a small team because the maintenance is easier and you don't need to know how to code". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and HAProxy. See our AWS WAF vs. Radware Alteon report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.