Azure Data Factory vs Jitterbit Harmony comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
25,660 views|20,160 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Jitterbit Logo
647 views|545 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Data Factory and Jitterbit Harmony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Data Factory vs. Jitterbit Harmony Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Data Factory's most valuable feature is Copy Activity.""The data factory agent is quite good and programming or defining the value of jobs, processes, and activities is easy.""The most valuable features of Azure Data Factory are the flexibility, ability to move data at scale, and the integrations with different Azure components.""Data Factory's best features include its data source connections, GUI for building data pipelines, and target loading within Azure.""The solution is okay.""It's extremely consistent.""The function of the solution is great.""Microsoft supported us when we planned to provision Azure Data Factory over a private link. As a result, we received excellent support from Microsoft."

More Azure Data Factory Pros →

"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors).""Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried.""We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate.""Easy integration with Salesforce""The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations.""It is a scalable solution.""It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput.""Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."

More Jitterbit Harmony Pros →

Cons
"When the record fails, it's tough to identify and log.""The number of standard adaptors could be extended further.""User-friendliness and user effectiveness are unquestionably important, and it may be a good option here to improve the user experience. However, I believe that more and more sophisticated monitoring would be beneficial.""Real-time replication is required, and this is not a simple task.""Azure Data Factory's pricing in terms of utilization could be improved.""There is no built-in pipeline exit activity when encountering an error.""Integration of data lineage would be a nice feature in terms of DevOps integration. It would make implementation for a company much easier. I'm not sure if that's already available or not. However, that would be a great feature to add if it isn't already there.""Data Factory could be improved in terms of data transformations by adding more metadata extractions."

More Azure Data Factory Cons →

"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations.""I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security.""There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data.""You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes.""Its API management capabilities need improvement.""The initial setup can be a little bit difficult.""Sometimes additional connectors are needed.""Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."

More Jitterbit Harmony Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "In terms of licensing costs, we pay somewhere around S14,000 USD per month. There are some additional costs. For example, we would have to subscribe to some additional computing and for elasticity, but they are minimal."
  • "This is a cost-effective solution."
  • "The price you pay is determined by how much you use it."
  • "Understanding the pricing model for Data Factory is quite complex."
  • "I would not say that this product is overly expensive."
  • "The licensing is a pay-as-you-go model, where you pay for what you consume."
  • "Our licensing fees are approximately 15,000 ($150 USD) per month."
  • "The licensing cost is included in the Synapse."
  • More Azure Data Factory Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."
  • "The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."
  • "I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."
  • "Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."
  • "The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"
  • "The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."
  • More Jitterbit Harmony Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
    Top Answer:Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up and… more »
    Top Answer:Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    25,660
    Comparisons
    20,160
    Reviews
    47
    Average Words per Review
    509
    Rating
    8.0
    35th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    647
    Comparisons
    545
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    234
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.

    Open source integration platform designed to handle the most complex integration challenges between legacy, enterprise and On-Demand applications. 

    Sample Customers
    1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa
    LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company34%
    Insurance Company11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Data Factory vs. Jitterbit Harmony
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Data Factory vs. Jitterbit Harmony and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Data Factory is ranked 1st in Data Integration with 81 reviews while Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 35th in Data Integration with 13 reviews. Azure Data Factory is rated 8.0, while Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Data Factory writes "The data factory agent is quite good but pricing needs to be more transparent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". Azure Data Factory is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Alteryx Designer, Snowflake and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, whereas Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Mule Anypoint Platform, SnapLogic and TIBCO Scribe. See our Azure Data Factory vs. Jitterbit Harmony report.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.